» Articles » PMID: 27134302

Arterial Limb Microemboli During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Observations from a Congenital Cardiac Surgery Practice

Overview
Publisher EDP Sciences
Date 2016 May 3
PMID 27134302
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gaseous microemboli (GME) are known to be delivered to the arterial circulation of patients during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). An increased number of GME delivered during adult CPB has been associated with brain injury and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. The GME load in children exposed to CPB and its consequences are not well characterized. We sought to establish a baseline of arterial limb emboli counts during the conduct of CPB for our population of patients requiring surgery for congenital heart disease. We used the emboli detection and counting (EDAC) device to measure GME activity in 103 consecutive patients for which an EDAC machine was available. Emboli counts for GME <40 μ and >40 μ were quantified and indexed to CPB time (minutes) and body surface area (BSA) to account for the variation in patient size and CPB times. Patients of all sizes had a similar embolic burden when indexed to bypass time and BSA. Furthermore, patients of all sizes saw a three-fold increase in the <40 μ embolic burden and a five-fold increase in the >40 μ embolic burden when regular air was noted in the venous line. The use of kinetic venous-assisted drainage did not significantly increase arterial limb GME. Efforts for early identification and mitigation of venous line air are warranted to minimize GME transmission to congenital cardiac surgery patients during CPB.

Citing Articles

Hybrid Left Heart Bypass Circuit for Repair of the Descending Aorta in an 8-kg Williams Syndrome Patient.

Matte G, Regan W, Connor K, Daaboul D, Hoganson D, Quinonez L J Extra Corpor Technol. 2021; 53(3):186-192.

PMID: 34658410 PMC: 8499637. DOI: 10.1182/ject-2100022.


Recent innovations in perfusion and cardiopulmonary bypass for neonatal and infant cardiac surgery.

Sturmer D, Beaty C, Clingan S, Jenkins E, Peters W, Si M Transl Pediatr. 2018; 7(2):139-150.

PMID: 29770295 PMC: 5938255. DOI: 10.21037/tp.2018.03.05.


An In-Vitro Study Comparing the GME Handling of Two Contemporary Oxygenators.

Gisnarian C, Hedman A, Shann K J Extra Corpor Technol. 2018; 49(4):262-272.

PMID: 29302117 PMC: 5737430.

References
1.
Win K, Wang S, Undar A . Microemboli generation, detection and characterization during CPB procedures in neonates, infants, and small children. ASAIO J. 2008; 54(5):486-90. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181857e6a. View

2.
Pascale F . Removal of gaseous microemboli from extracorporeal circulation. Med Instrum. 1985; 19(2):70-2. View

3.
Hudacko A, Sievert A, Sistino J . Gaseous microemboli in a pediatric bypass circuit with an unprimed venous line: an in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009; 41(3):166-71. PMC: 4679952. View

4.
Willcox T, Mitchell S . Microemboli in our bypass circuits: a contemporary audit. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010; 41(4):P31-7. PMC: 4813533. View

5.
De Somer F . Impact of oxygenator characteristics on its capability to remove gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008; 39(4):271-3. View