» Articles » PMID: 27130539

Feedback Mechanisms Control Coexistence in a Stem Cell Model of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Overview
Journal J Theor Biol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 May 1
PMID 27130539
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Haematopoietic stem cell dynamics regulate healthy blood cell production and are disrupted during leukaemia. Competition models of cellular species help to elucidate stem cell dynamics in the bone marrow microenvironment (or niche), and to determine how these dynamics impact leukaemia progression. Here we develop two models that target acute myeloid leukaemia with particular focus on the mechanisms that control proliferation via feedback signalling. It is within regions of parameter space permissive of coexistence that the effects of competition are most subtle and the clinical outcome least certain. Steady state and linear stability analyses identify parameter regions that allow for coexistence to occur, and allow us to characterise behaviour near critical points. Where analytical expressions are no longer informative, we proceed statistically and sample parameter space over a coexistence region. We find that the rates of proliferation and differentiation of healthy progenitors exert key control over coexistence. We also show that inclusion of a regulatory feedback onto progenitor cells promotes healthy haematopoiesis at the expense of leukaemia, and that - somewhat paradoxically - within the coexistence region feedback increases the sensitivity of the system to dominance by one lineage over another.

Citing Articles

Predictive nonlinear modeling of malignant myelopoiesis and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Rodriguez J, Iniguez A, Jena N, Tata P, Liu Z, Lander A Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37115622 PMC: 10212564. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.84149.


Implementation and acceleration of optimal control for systems biology.

Sharp J, Burrage K, Simpson M J R Soc Interface. 2021; 18(181):20210241.

PMID: 34428951 PMC: 8385371. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0241.


Differential response to cytotoxic therapy explains treatment dynamics of acute myeloid leukaemia patients: insights from a mathematical modelling approach.

Hoffmann H, Thiede C, Glauche I, Bornhaeuser M, Roeder I J R Soc Interface. 2020; 17(170):20200091.

PMID: 32900301 PMC: 7536048. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0091.


Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its impact on patient trajectories after stem cell transplantation.

Park D, Akuffo A, Muench D, Grimes H, Epling-Burnette P, Maini P PLoS Comput Biol. 2019; 15(4):e1006913.

PMID: 31026273 PMC: 6505959. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006913.


Study of cohabitation and interconnection effects on normal and leukaemic stem cells dynamics in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Zenati A, Chakir M, Tadjine M IET Syst Biol. 2018; 12(6):279-288.

PMID: 30472692 PMC: 8687407. DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2018.5026.


References
1.
Horn M, Glauche I, Muller M, Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A, Loeffler M . Model-based decision rules reduce the risk of molecular relapse after cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012; 121(2):378-84. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-441956. View

2.
Schuurhuis G, Meel M, Wouters F, Min L, Terwijn M, de Jonge N . Normal hematopoietic stem cells within the AML bone marrow have a distinct and higher ALDH activity level than co-existing leukemic stem cells. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e78897. PMC: 3823975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078897. View

3.
Komorowski M, Costa M, Rand D, Stumpf M . Sensitivity, robustness, and identifiability in stochastic chemical kinetics models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(21):8645-50. PMC: 3102369. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015814108. View

4.
Passegue E, Jamieson C, Ailles L, Weissman I . Normal and leukemic hematopoiesis: are leukemias a stem cell disorder or a reacquisition of stem cell characteristics?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100 Suppl 1:11842-9. PMC: 304096. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2034201100. View

5.
Dean M, Fojo T, Bates S . Tumour stem cells and drug resistance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5(4):275-84. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1590. View