Letter to the Editor
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Chan T, Partin A, Walsh P, Epstein J
. Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000; 56(5):823-7.
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00753-6.
View
2.
Kang D, Fitzsimons N, Presti Jr J, Kane C, Terris M, Aronson W
. Risk stratification of men with Gleason score 7 to 10 tumors by primary and secondary Gleason score: results from the SEARCH database. Urology. 2007; 70(2):277-82.
PMC: 3275808.
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.059.
View
3.
Pierorazio P, Walsh P, Partin A, Epstein J
. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. 2013; 111(5):753-60.
PMC: 3978145.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x.
View
4.
Turk H, Celik O, Un S, Yoldas M, Isoglu C, Karabicak M
. Predictive factors for biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients. Cent European J Urol. 2016; 68(4):404-9.
PMC: 4742437.
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2015.606.
View