» Articles » PMID: 27122563

Habituation in Non-neural Organisms: Evidence from Slime Moulds

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Apr 29
PMID 27122563
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning, defined as a change in behaviour evoked by experience, has hitherto been investigated almost exclusively in multicellular neural organisms. Evidence for learning in non-neural multicellular organisms is scant, and only a few unequivocal reports of learning have been described in single-celled organisms. Here we demonstrate habituation, an unmistakable form of learning, in the non-neural organism Physarum polycephalum In our experiment, using chemotaxis as the behavioural output and quinine or caffeine as the stimulus, we showed that P. polycephalum learnt to ignore quinine or caffeine when the stimuli were repeated, but responded again when the stimulus was withheld for a certain time. Our results meet the principle criteria that have been used to demonstrate habituation: responsiveness decline and spontaneous recovery. To distinguish habituation from sensory adaptation or motor fatigue, we also show stimulus specificity. Our results point to the diversity of organisms lacking neurons, which likely display a hitherto unrecognized capacity for learning, and suggest that slime moulds may be an ideal model system in which to investigate fundamental mechanisms underlying learning processes. Besides, documenting learning in non-neural organisms such as slime moulds is centrally important to a comprehensive, phylogenetic understanding of when and where in the tree of life the earliest manifestations of learning evolved.

Citing Articles

A mathematical model to predict network growth in as a function of extracellular matrix viscosity, measured by a novel viscometer.

Rosina P, Grube M J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(224):20240720.

PMID: 40037543 PMC: 11879620. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0720.


On the prospects of basal cognition research becoming fully evolutionary: promising avenues and cautionary notes.

Fabregas-Tejeda A, Sims M Hist Philos Life Sci. 2025; 47(1):10.

PMID: 39913055 PMC: 11802611. DOI: 10.1007/s40656-025-00660-y.


A minimal model of cognition based on oscillatory and current-based reinforcement processes.

Gyllingberg L, Tian Y, Sumpter D J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):rsif20240402.

PMID: 39837485 PMC: 11750385. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0402.


Non-Equilibrium Quantum Brain Dynamics: Water Coupled with Phonons and Photons.

Nishiyama A, Tanaka S, Tuszynski J Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(11).

PMID: 39593925 PMC: 11592528. DOI: 10.3390/e26110981.


Novel image-analytic approach reveals new insights in fine-tuning of slime mould network adaptation.

Rosina P, Grube M R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(10):240950.

PMID: 39493301 PMC: 11528663. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240950.


References
1.
Cook N, Haylett D . Effects of apamin, quinine and neuromuscular blockers on calcium-activated potassium channels in guinea-pig hepatocytes. J Physiol. 1985; 358:373-94. PMC: 1193347. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015556. View

2.
Knowles D, CARLILE M . The chemotactic response of plasmodia of the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum to sugars and related compounds. J Gen Microbiol. 1978; 108(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-108-1-17. View

3.
Ueda K, Takagi S, Nishiura Y, Nakagaki T . Mathematical model for contemplative amoeboid locomotion. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011; 83(2 Pt 1):021916. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.021916. View

4.
Walden J, Speckmann E . Effects of quinine on membrane potential and membrane currents in identified neurons of Helix pomatia. Neurosci Lett. 1981; 27(2):139-43. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(81)90258-5. View

5.
Misra U, Gawdi G, Pizzo S . Chloroquine, quinine and quinidine inhibit calcium release from macrophage intracellular stores by blocking inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate binding to its receptor. J Cell Biochem. 1997; 64(2):225-32. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(199702)64:2<225::aid-jcb6>3.0.co;2-z. View