» Articles » PMID: 27122132

Comparison of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast-conserving Surgery Between Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Apr 29
PMID 27122132
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the differences in the rates and predictive factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) between ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer. And, we evaluated the impact of IBTR on overall survival and distant metastasis.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 322 consecutive patients with DCIS or invasive breast cancer who underwent BCS between 2004 and 2010. We evaluated the rates of IBTR of DCIS and invasive breast cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors for IBTR, and survival rates were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Results: With a median follow-up period of 57 months, 5 (10%) out of 50 DCIS patients and 14 (5.1%) out of 272 invasive cancer patients had developed IBTR. Factors associated with IBTR on univariate and multivariate analyses were positive resection margin status in DCIS and omission of radiotherapy in invasive cancer, respectively. The hormone receptor negativity was strong independent predictive factors for IBTR in both DCIS and invasive breast cancer. Although the differences of survival curve did not reach statistical significance, the 5-year overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival of invasive cancer patients who suffered IBTR were inferior to those without (84 vs. 98% and 63.3 vs. 96.5%, respectively). Advanced initial stage, lymph node metastasis and experience of IBTR were associated with poor overall survival and distant metastasis on univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusions: The hormone receptor negativity was revealed as independent predictive factor for IBTR after BCS in both DCIS and invasive cancer. Experience of IBTR was independent prognostic factor for poor overall outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer. Aggressive local control and adjuvant therapy should be made in hormone receptor-negative patients who receive treatment with BCS.

Citing Articles

Immunohistochemical expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein and ezrin in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type: a retrospective analysis.

Shalaby M, Dawoud M, Gadallah M, Abdou A Diagn Pathol. 2025; 20(1):8.

PMID: 39827339 PMC: 11742503. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-025-01598-2.


Personalized circulating tumor DNA response to local radiotherapy in a patient with an early lobular breast cancer: A case report.

Capella M, Fallah P, Basik M Oncol Lett. 2024; 27(6):282.

PMID: 38736743 PMC: 11082640. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14415.


Impact of immunohistochemical expression of kinesin family member 18A (Kif18A) and β-catenin in infiltrating breast carcinoma of no special type.

Hemida A, Shabaan M, Taha M, Abdou A World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):15.

PMID: 38195458 PMC: 10777553. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03276-3.


Residual Risk of Ipsilateral Tumor Recurrence in Patients Who Achieved Clear Lumpectomy Margins After Repeated Resection.

Cheun J, Kim H, Lee H, Han W, Moon H J Breast Cancer. 2023; 26(6):558-571.

PMID: 37985383 PMC: 10761757. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e46.


Oncofertility and Reproductive Counseling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Zaami S, Melcarne R, Patrone R, Gullo G, Negro F, Napoletano G J Clin Med. 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35268402 PMC: 8911138. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051311.


References
1.
Tamura N, Tsuda H, Yoshida M, Hojo T, Akashi-Tanaka S, Kinoshita T . Clinicopathological predictive factors for ipsilateral and contralateral events following initial surgery to treat ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer. 2015; 23(3):510-8. PMC: 4839035. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-015-0595-x. View

2.
Fisher E, Anderson S, Tan-Chiu E, Fisher B, Eaton L, Wolmark N . Fifteen-year prognostic discriminants for invasive breast carcinoma: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol-06. Cancer. 2001; 91(8 Suppl):1679-87. View

3.
Fisher B, Wickerham D, Deutsch M, Anderson S, Redmond C, Fisher E . Breast tumor recurrence following lumpectomy with and without breast irradiation: an overview of recent NSABP findings. Semin Surg Oncol. 1992; 8(3):153-60. View

4.
Whelan T, Clark R, Roberts R, Levine M, Foster G . Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence postlumpectomy is predictive of subsequent mortality: results from a randomized trial. Investigators of the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994; 30(1):11-6. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90513-4. View

5.
Haffty B, Reiss M, Beinfield M, Fischer D, Ward B, MCKHANN C . Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence as a predictor of distant disease: implications for systemic therapy at the time of local relapse. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(1):52-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.52. View