» Articles » PMID: 27117768

The Lure of Rationality: Why Does the Deficit Model Persist in Science Communication?

Overview
Date 2016 Apr 28
PMID 27117768
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Science communication has been historically predicated on the knowledge deficit model. Yet, empirical research has shown that public communication of science is more complex than what the knowledge deficit model suggests. In this essay, we pose four lines of reasoning and present empirical data for why we believe the deficit model still persists in public communication of science. First, we posit that scientists' training results in the belief that public audiences can and do process information in a rational manner. Second, the persistence of this model may be a product of current institutional structures. Many graduate education programs in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields generally lack formal training in public communication. We offer empirical evidence that demonstrates that scientists who have less positive attitudes toward the social sciences are more likely to adhere to the knowledge deficit model of science communication. Third, we present empirical evidence of how scientists conceptualize "the public" and link this to attitudes toward the deficit model. We find that perceiving a knowledge deficit in the public is closely tied to scientists' perceptions of the individuals who comprise the public. Finally, we argue that the knowledge deficit model is perpetuated because it can easily influence public policy for science issues. We propose some ways to uproot the deficit model and move toward more effective science communication efforts, which include training scientists in communication methods grounded in social science research and using approaches that engage community members around scientific issues.

Citing Articles

Behind the scenes with genomics researchers.

MontAlverne R, MontAlverne Bretz Giovanini R, Bradford L, Buckmaster C, Strickert G, MacLean J Front Genet. 2024; 15:1467404.

PMID: 39726953 PMC: 11669665. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1467404.


Where public health meets public opinion: Understanding political support for fluoridation in Calgary, 2021.

Lucas J, McGregor R, Kiss S, Perrella A Can J Public Health. 2024; .

PMID: 39557770 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00960-z.


Development of a Scale to Measure Planned Behavior in Inclusive Science Communication: Validity Evidence in Undergraduate STEM Students.

Worthington D, Graham B, Gilliard H, Kelp N CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024; 23(4):ar48.

PMID: 39374167 PMC: 11659846. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.24-01-0012.


Incorporating sense of place into the management of social-ecological systems: The researchers' perspectives.

Duggan J, Clement S, Cvitanovic C, van Putten I PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0308726.

PMID: 39269954 PMC: 11398684. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308726.


Equitable differential privacy.

Kaul V, Mukherjee T Front Big Data. 2024; 7:1420344.

PMID: 39220199 PMC: 11363707. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1420344.