» Articles » PMID: 27116604

Size Relationships of Different Body Parts in the Three Dipteran Species Drosophila Melanogaster, Ceratitis Capitata and Musca Domestica

Overview
Journal Dev Genes Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Apr 27
PMID 27116604
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Body size is an integral feature of an organism that influences many aspects of life such as fecundity, life span and mating success. Size of individual organs and the entire body size represent quantitative traits with a large reaction norm, which are influenced by various environmental factors. In the model system Drosophila melanogaster, pupal size and adult traits, such as tibia and thorax length or wing size, accurately estimate the overall body size. However, it is unclear whether these traits can be used in other flies. Therefore, we studied changes in size of pupae and adult organs in response to different rearing temperatures and densities for D. melanogaster, Ceratitis capitata and Musca domestica. We confirm a clear sexual size dimorphism (SSD) for Drosophila and show that the SSD is less uniform in the other species. Moreover, the size response to changing growth conditions is sex dependent. Comparison of static and evolutionary allometries of the studied traits revealed that response to the same environmental variable is genotype specific but has similarities between species of the same order. We conclude that the value of adult traits as estimators of the absolute body size may differ among species and the use of a single trait may result in wrong assumptions. Therefore, we suggest using a body size coefficient computed from several individual measurements. Our data is of special importance for monitoring activities of natural populations of the three dipteran flies, since they are harmful species causing economical damage (Drosophila, Ceratitis) or transferring diseases (Musca).

Citing Articles

Estimation of genetic parameters for the implementation of selective breeding in commercial insect production.

Hansen L, Laursen S, Bahrndorff S, Kargo M, Sorensen J, Sahana G Genet Sel Evol. 2024; 56(1):21.

PMID: 38528443 PMC: 10962107. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00894-7.


Imaginal disk growth factors are Drosophila chitinase-like proteins with roles in morphogenesis and CO2 response.

Sustar A, Strand L, Zimmerman S, Berg C Genetics. 2022; 223(2).

PMID: 36576887 PMC: 9910413. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac185.


Complex effects of environment and Wolbachia infections on the life history of Drosophila melanogaster hosts.

Strunov A, Lerch S, Blanckenhorn W, Miller W, Kapun M J Evol Biol. 2022; 35(6):788-802.

PMID: 35532932 PMC: 9321091. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14016.


Interspecific introgression reveals a role of male genital morphology during the evolution of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

Frazee S, Harper A, Afkhami M, Wood M, McCrory J, Masly J Evolution. 2021; 75(5):989-1002.

PMID: 33433903 PMC: 8248101. DOI: 10.1111/evo.14169.


Quantifying Metacyclic Promastigotes from Individual Sandfly Bites Reveals the Efficiency of Vector Transmission.

Giraud E, Martin O, Yakob L, Rogers M Commun Biol. 2019; 2:84.

PMID: 30854476 PMC: 6395631. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0323-8.


References
1.
David J, Clavel M . [Influence of temperature during the course of development on various biometric characteristics of adult Drosophila melanogaster Meigen]. J Insect Physiol. 1967; 13(5):717-29. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1910(67)90121-7. View

2.
Edgar B . How flies get their size: genetics meets physiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2006; 7(12):907-16. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1989. View

3.
Gleiser R, Urrutia J, Gorla D . Body size variation of the floodwater mosquito Aedes albifasciatus in Central Argentina. Med Vet Entomol. 2000; 14(1):38-43. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00217.x. View

4.
Santos M, Fowler K, Partridge L . Gene-environment interaction for body size and larval density in Drosophila melanogaster: an investigation of effects on development time, thorax length and adult sex ratio. Heredity (Edinb). 1994; 72 ( Pt 5):515-21. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1994.69. View

5.
Klingenberg C . MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 11(2):353-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x. View