» Articles » PMID: 27114882

In Four Shallow and Mesophotic Tropical Reef Sponges from Guam the Microbial Community Largely Depends on Host Identity

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2016 Apr 27
PMID 27114882
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sponges (phylum Porifera) are important members of almost all aquatic ecosystems, and are renowned for hosting often dense and diverse microbial communities. While the specificity of the sponge microbiota seems to be closely related to host phylogeny, the environmental factors that could shape differences within local sponge-specific communities remain less understood. On tropical coral reefs, sponge habitats can span from shallow areas to deeper, mesophotic sites. These habitats differ in terms of environmental factors such as light, temperature, and food availability, as well as anthropogenic impact. In order to study the host specificity and potential influence of varying habitats on the sponge microbiota within a local area, four tropical reef sponges, Rhabdastrella globostellata, Callyspongia sp., Rhaphoxya sp., and Acanthella cavernosa, were collected from exposed shallow reef slopes and a deep reef drop-off. Based on 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing profiles, beta diversity analyses revealed that each sponge species possessed a specific microbiota that was significantly different to those of the other species and exhibited attributes that are characteristic of high- and/or low-microbial-abundance sponges. These findings emphasize the influence of host identity on the associated microbiota. Dominant sponge- and seawater-associated bacterial phyla were Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, and Proteobacteria. Comparison of individual sponge taxa and seawater samples between shallow and deep reef sites revealed no significant variation in alpha diversity estimates, while differences in microbial beta diversity (variation in community composition) were significant for Callyspongia sp. sponges and seawater samples. Overall, the sponge-associated microbiota is significantly shaped by host identity across all samples, while the effect of habitat differentiation seems to be less predominant in tropical reef sponges.

Citing Articles

Diversity and Activity of Bacteria Cultured from a Cup-The Sponge .

Itelson L, Merav M, Haymi S, Carmeli S, Ilan M Mar Drugs. 2024; 22(10).

PMID: 39452848 PMC: 11509412. DOI: 10.3390/md22100440.


Divergent Microbiota Dynamics along the Coastal Marine Ecosystem of Puerto Rico.

Louime C, Vazquez-Sanchez F, Derilus D, Godoy-Vitorino F Microbiol Res (Pavia). 2024; 11(2):45-55.

PMID: 39175946 PMC: 11340205. DOI: 10.3390/microbiolres11020009.


A Study of Sponge Symbionts from Different Light Habitats.

Cleary D, de Voogd N, Stuij T, Swierts T, Oliveira V, Polonia A Microb Ecol. 2023; 86(4):2819-2837.

PMID: 37597041 PMC: 10640470. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-023-02267-x.


Sponge holobionts shift their prokaryotic communities and antimicrobial activity from shallow to lower mesophotic depths.

Indraningrat A, Steinert G, Becking L, Mueller B, de Goeij J, Smidt H Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2022; 115(10):1265-1283.

PMID: 35998007 PMC: 9534810. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-022-01770-4.


Stability of the Microbiome of the Sponge () in the Western Antarctic Peninsula.

Happel L, Rondon R, Font A, Gonzalez-Aravena M, Cardenas C Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:827863.

PMID: 35444618 PMC: 9014287. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.827863.


References
1.
Cardenas C, Bell J, Davy S, Hoggard M, Taylor M . Influence of environmental variation on symbiotic bacterial communities of two temperate sponges. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014; 88(3):516-27. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12317. View

2.
Schmitt S, Deines P, Behnam F, Wagner M, Taylor M . Chloroflexi bacteria are more diverse, abundant, and similar in high than in low microbial abundance sponges. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011; 78(3):497-510. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01179.x. View

3.
Joachimiak M, Weisman J, May B . JColorGrid: software for the visualization of biological measurements. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7:225. PMC: 1479842. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-225. View

4.
Hardoim C, Costa R . Temporal dynamics of prokaryotic communities in the marine sponge Sarcotragus spinosulus. Mol Ecol. 2014; 23(12):3097-112. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12789. View

5.
Simister R, Taylor M, Rogers K, Schupp P, Deines P . Temporal molecular and isotopic analysis of active bacterial communities in two New Zealand sponges. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013; 85(1):195-205. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12109. View