» Articles » PMID: 27098450

Psychometric Properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: a Pilot Study

Overview
Date 2016 Apr 22
PMID 27098450
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To date there is a lack of studies assessing the psychometric properties of the recently revised PTSD Checklist (PCL), the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The aim of this pilot study was to examine the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in parents of children with burns.

Methods: The participating parents (N=62, mean age=38) completed self-report questionnaires, 0.8-5.6 years after their child's burn. Measures were the PCL-5, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Burn severity of the child and sociodemographic variables was obtained.

Results: The parents' average PCL-5 scores were low to moderate. The internal consistency of the PCL-5 was satisfactory, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.56 to 0.77 and mean inter-item correlations ranging from 0.22 to 0.73 for the four PCL-5 subscales and the PCL-5 total. The PCL-5 subscales were moderately to highly correlated with the corresponding IES-R subscales as well as MADRS and PSS (p<0.05), whereas associations with sociodemographics and burn severity were low to moderate.

Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the use of PCL-5. The results indicate satisfactory psychometric properties of the PCL-5 as measured with internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and aspects of convergent validity.

Citing Articles

Screening and Assessment for Psychological Distress among Burn Survivors.

Loehr V, Goette W, Roaten K Eur Burn J. 2024; 3(1):57-88.

PMID: 39604177 PMC: 11575395. DOI: 10.3390/ebj3010008.


Assessment of the impact an educational intervention on post-traumatic stress disorder and social cognitive theory constructs in women with sexual assault experience: a study protocol for a clinical trial.

Vafaeinejad N, Boroumandfar Z, Kazemi A, Dehsorkhi H, Sohrabi S Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):141.

PMID: 39380007 PMC: 11462827. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01866-2.


Physical, Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Health Outcomes of Parents in the First Six Months after Childhood Critical Illness: A Prospective Single Centre Study.

Poh P, Lee J, Sultana R, Manning J, Carey M, Latour J Children (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39201883 PMC: 11353106. DOI: 10.3390/children11080948.


Physician Posttraumatic Stress Disorder During COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kamra M, Dhaliwal S, Li W, Acharya S, Wong A, Zhu A JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(7):e2423316.

PMID: 39046740 PMC: 11270139. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.23316.


Mapping the availability of translated versions of posttraumatic stress disorder screening questionnaires for adults: A scoping review.

Hoffman J, Ben-Zion Z, Arevalo A, Duek O, Greene T, Hall B Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024; 13(2):2143019.

PMID: 38872602 PMC: 9724641. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2143019.


References
1.
Clark L, Watson D . Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychol Assess. 2019; 31(12):1412-1427. PMC: 6754793. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000626. View

2.
McDonald S, Calhoun P . The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD checklist: a critical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010; 30(8):976-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012. View

3.
Sveen J, Low A, Dyster-Aas J, Ekselius L, Willebrand M, Gerdin B . Validation of a Swedish version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) in patients with burns. J Anxiety Disord. 2010; 24(6):618-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.021. View

4.
Odar C, Brown Kirschman K, Pelley T, Butz C, Besner G, Fabia R . Prevalence and correlates of posttraumatic stress in parents of young children postburn. J Burn Care Res. 2012; 34(3):299-306. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31825ae15d. View

5.
Brady K, Killeen T, Brewerton T, Lucerini S . Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000; 61 Suppl 7:22-32. View