Strain-time Curve Analysis by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Insight into the Pathophysiology of Responders Vs. Non-responders

Overview

Journal Cardiovasc Ultrasound

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Cardiology & Vascular Diseases
Radiology

Date 2016 Apr 20

PMID 27090784

Citations 6

Authors

Andrew C Y To

Rodolfo D Benatti

Kimi Sato

Richard A Grimm

James D Thomas

Bruce L Wilkoff

Deborah Agler

Zoran B Popovic

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Patients with non-ischemic heart failure etiology and left bundle branch block (LBBB) show better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). While these patients have the most pronounced left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, LV dyssynchrony assessment often fails to predict outcome. We hypothesized that patients with favorable outcome from CRT can be identified by a characteristic strain distribution pattern.

Methods: From 313 patients who underwent CRT between 2003 and 2006, we identified 10 patients who were CRT non-responders (no LV end-systolic volume [LVESV] reduction) with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB and compared with randomly selected CRT responders (n = 10; LVESV reduction ≥15%). Longitudinal strain (εlong) data were obtained by speckle tracking echocardiography before and after (9 ± 5 months) CRT implantation and standardized segmental εlong-time curves were obtained by averaging individual patients.

Results: In responders, ejection fraction (EF) increased from 25 ± 9 to 40 ± 11% (p = 0.002), while in non-responders, EF was unchanged (20 ± 8 to 21 ± 5%, p = 0.57). Global εlong was significantly lower in non-responders at pre CRT (p = 0.02) and only improved in responders (p = 0.04) after CRT. Pre CRT septal εlong -time curves in both groups showed early septal contraction with mid-systolic decrease, while lateral εlong showed early stretch followed by vigorous mid to late contraction. Restoration of contraction synchrony was observed in both groups, though non-responder remained low amplitude of εlong.

Conclusions: CRT non-responders with LBBB and non-ischemic etiology showed a similar improvement of εlong pattern with responders after CRT implantation, while amplitude of εlong remained unchanged. Lower εlong in the non-responders may account for their poor response to CRT.

Citing Articles

State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Laczay B, Patel D, Grimm R, Xu B Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021; 11(3):881-895.

PMID: 34295711 PMC: 8261739. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-20-724.

Evaluation of left ventricular systolic synchrony by peak strain dispersion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Ji X, Zhang X, Feng H J Int Med Res. 2021; 49(4):3000605211007737.

PMID: 33892606 PMC: 8076778. DOI: 10.1177/03000605211007737.

Regional Strain Pattern Index-A Novel Technique to Predict CRT Response.

Orszulak M, Filipecki A, Wrobel W, Berger-Kucza A, Orszulak W, Urbanczyk-Swic D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(3).

PMID: 33494456 PMC: 7908216. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18030926.

The Role of Echocardiography in the Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Spartalis M, Tzatzaki E, Spartalis E, Damaskos C, Athanasiou A, Livanis E Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2018; 11:133-145.

PMID: 29387277 PMC: 5748829. DOI: 10.2174/1874192401711010133.

Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Mele D, Bertini M, Malagu M, Nardozza M, Ferrari R Heart Fail Rev. 2017; 22(6):699-722.

PMID: 28714039 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-017-9636-1.

References

Yu C, Chau E, Sanderson J, Fan K, Tang M, Fung W . Tissue Doppler echocardiographic evidence of reverse remodeling and improved synchronicity by simultaneously delaying regional contraction after biventricular pacing therapy in heart failure. Circulation. 2002; 105(4):438-45. DOI: 10.1161/hc0402.102623. View

Prinzen F, HUNTER W, Wyman B, McVeigh E . Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33(6):1735-42. PMC: 2041911. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00068-6. View

Verbeek X, Vernooy K, Peschar M, Cornelussen R, Prinzen F . Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42(3):558-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00641-7. View

Bax J, Bleeker G, Marwick T, Molhoek S, Boersma E, Steendijk P . Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44(9):1834-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016. View

Otasevic P, Popovic Z, Vasiljevic J, Vidakovic R, Pratali L, Vlahovic A . Relation of myocardial histomorphometric features and left ventricular contractile reserve assessed by high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005; 7(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.01.017. View

Helm R, Leclercq C, Faris O, Ozturk C, McVeigh E, Lardo A . Cardiac dyssynchrony analysis using circumferential versus longitudinal strain: implications for assessing cardiac resynchronization. Circulation. 2005; 111(21):2760-7. PMC: 2396330. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.508457. View

Suffoletto M, Dohi K, Cannesson M, Saba S, Gorcsan 3rd J . Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006; 113(7):960-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.571455. View

Murphy R, Sigurdsson G, Mulamalla S, Agler D, Popovic Z, Starling R . Tissue synchronization imaging and optimal left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97(11):1615-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.054. View

Beshai J, Grimm R, Nagueh S, Baker 2nd J, Beau S, Greenberg S . Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with narrow QRS complexes. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(24):2461-71. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706695. View

10.

Popovic Z, Grimm R, Ahmad A, Agler D, Favia M, Dan G . Longitudinal rotation: an unrecognised motion pattern in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2007; 94(3):e11. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.122192. View

11.

Gorcsan 3rd J, Abraham T, Agler D, Bax J, Derumeaux G, Grimm R . Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting--a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21(3):191-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.01.003. View

12.

Delgado V, Ypenburg C, van Bommel R, Tops L, Mollema S, Ajmone Marsan N . Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51(20):1944-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.040. View

13.

Chung E, Leon A, Tavazzi L, Sun J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J . Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008; 117(20):2608-16. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743120. View

14.

Cleland J, Freemantle N, Ghio S, Fruhwald F, Shankar A, Marijanowski M . Predicting the long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on mortality from baseline variables and the early response a report from the CARE-HF (Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(6):438-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.036. View

15.

Kirn B, Jansen A, Bracke F, van Gelder B, Arts T, Prinzen F . Mechanical discoordination rather than dyssynchrony predicts reverse remodeling upon cardiac resynchronization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 295(2):H640-6. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00106.2008. View

16.

DAndrea A, Caso P, Scarafile R, Riegler L, Salerno G, Castaldo F . Effects of global longitudinal strain and total scar burden on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009; 11(1):58-67. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfn010. View

17.

Carasso S, Rakowski H, Witte K, Smith P, Carasso D, Garceau P . Left ventricular strain patterns in dilated cardiomyopathy predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: timing is not everything. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22(3):242-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.12.003. View

18.

Phillips K, Popovic Z, Lim P, Meulet J, Barrett C, Di Biase L . Opposing wall mechanics are significantly influenced by longitudinal cardiac rotation in the assessment of ventricular dyssynchrony. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2(4):379-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.022. View

19.

Roes S, Mollema S, Lamb H, van der Wall E, de Roos A, Bax J . Validation of echocardiographic two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain imaging for viability assessment in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 104(3):312-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.040. View

20.

Puwanant S, Park M, Popovic Z, Tang W, Farha S, George D . Ventricular geometry, strain, and rotational mechanics in pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2010; 121(2):259-66. PMC: 2846516. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.844340. View