» Articles » PMID: 27088054

Single-subject Morphological Brain Networks: Connectivity Mapping, Topological Characterization and Test-retest Reliability

Overview
Journal Brain Behav
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 Apr 19
PMID 27088054
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Structural MRI has long been used to characterize local morphological features of the human brain. Coordination patterns of the local morphological features among regions, however, are not well understood. Here, we constructed individual-level morphological brain networks and systematically examined their topological organization and long-term test-retest reliability under different analytical schemes of spatial smoothing, brain parcellation, and network type.

Methods: This study included 57 healthy participants and all participants completed two MRI scan sessions. Individual morphological brain networks were constructed by estimating interregional similarity in the distribution of regional gray matter volume in terms of the Kullback-Leibler divergence measure. Graph-based global and nodal network measures were then calculated, followed by the statistical comparison and intra-class correlation analysis.

Results: The morphological brain networks were highly reproducible between sessions with significantly larger similarities for interhemispheric connections linking bilaterally homotopic regions. Further graph-based analyses revealed that the morphological brain networks exhibited nonrandom topological organization of small-worldness, high parallel efficiency and modular architecture regardless of the analytical choices of spatial smoothing, brain parcellation and network type. Moreover, several paralimbic and association regions were consistently revealed to be potential hubs. Nonetheless, the three studied factors particularly spatial smoothing significantly affected quantitative characterization of morphological brain networks. Further examination of long-term reliability revealed that all the examined network topological properties showed fair to excellent reliability irrespective of the analytical strategies, but performing spatial smoothing significantly improved reliability. Interestingly, nodal centralities were positively correlated with their reliabilities, and nodal degree and efficiency outperformed nodal betweenness with respect to reliability.

Conclusions: Our findings support single-subject morphological network analysis as a meaningful and reliable method to characterize structural organization of the human brain; this method thus opens a new avenue toward understanding the substrate of intersubject variability in behavior and function and establishing morphological network biomarkers in brain disorders.

Citing Articles

Association of individual-based morphological brain network alterations with cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Shen D, Huang X, Diao Z, Wang J, Wang K, Lu W Front Neurol. 2025; 15():1519397.

PMID: 39850732 PMC: 11754055. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1519397.


Disrupted gray matter connectome in vestibular migraine: a combined machine learning and individual-level morphological brain network analysis.

Chen W, Zhao H, Feng Q, Xiong X, Ke J, Dai L J Headache Pain. 2024; 25(1):177.

PMID: 39390381 PMC: 11468853. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01861-9.


Age-related changes of node degree in the multiple-demand network predict fluid intelligence.

Yu L, Zhang Q, Li X, Zhang M, Chen X, Lu M IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2024; 17:245-251.

PMID: 39297127 PMC: 11409069. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.06.005.


The brain network hub degeneration in Alzheimer's disease.

Jin S, Wang J, He Y Biophys Rep. 2024; 10(4):213-229.

PMID: 39281195 PMC: 11399886. DOI: 10.52601/bpr.2024.230025.


Differences in Topography of Individual Amyloid Brain Networks by Amyloid PET Images in Healthy Control, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer's Disease.

Ho T, Huang S, Huang C, Lin K, Hsu J, Huang K J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39231884 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01230-7.


References
1.
Sporns O . The human connectome: origins and challenges. Neuroimage. 2013; 80:53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.023. View

2.
Liang X, Wang J, Yan C, Shu N, Xu K, Gong G . Effects of different correlation metrics and preprocessing factors on small-world brain functional networks: a resting-state functional MRI study. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32766. PMC: 3295769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032766. View

3.
Bullmore E, Bassett D . Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010; 7:113-40. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934. View

4.
Craddock R, Jbabdi S, Yan C, Vogelstein J, Castellanos F, Di Martino A . Imaging human connectomes at the macroscale. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(6):524-39. PMC: 4096321. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2482. View

5.
Raj A, Mueller S, Young K, Laxer K, Weiner M . Network-level analysis of cortical thickness of the epileptic brain. Neuroimage. 2010; 52(4):1302-13. PMC: 2910126. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.045. View