» Articles » PMID: 27087828

Standardized Assessment of Psychosocial Factors and Their Influence on Medically Confirmed Health Outcomes in Workers: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Apr 19
PMID 27087828
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies of psychosocial work factors have indicated their importance for workers' health. However, to what extent health problems can be attributed to the nature of the work environment or other psychosocial factors is not clear. No previous systematic review has used inclusion criteria based on specific medical evaluation of work-related health outcomes and the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence assessing the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and workers' health based on studies that used standardized and validated instruments to assess the psychosocial work environment and that focused on medically confirmed health outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the databases PubMed, B-ON, Science Direct, Psycarticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection and the search engine (Google Scholar) using appropriate words for studies published from 2004 to 2014. This review follows the recommendations of the Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Studies were included in the review if data on psychosocial validated assessment method(s) for the study population and specific medical evaluation of health-related work outcome(s) were presented. In total, the search strategy yielded 10,623 references, of which 10 studies (seven prospective cohort and three cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (7/10) observed an adverse effect of poor psychosocial work factors on workers' health: 3 on sickness absence, 4 on cardiovascular diseases. The other 3 studies reported detrimental effects on sleep and on disease-associated biomarkers. A more consistent effect was observed in studies of higher methodological quality that used a prospective design jointly with the use of validated instruments for the assessment of the psychosocial (work) environment and clinical evaluation. More prospective studies are needed to assess the evidence of work-related psychosocial factors on workers´ health.

Citing Articles

The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review.

Vleeshouwers J, Flovik L, Christensen J, Johannessen H, Finne L, Mohr B Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022; 95(10):2025-2051.

PMID: 35829741 PMC: 9652268. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4.


New Avenues for Prevention of Work-Related Diseases Linked to Psychosocial Risks.

Guillemin M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21).

PMID: 34769869 PMC: 8582654. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111354.


Process of Work Disability: From Determinants of Sickness Absence Trajectories to Disability Retirement in A Long-Term Follow-Up of Municipal Employees.

Leino-Arjas P, Seitsamo J, Nygard C, K C P, Neupane S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5).

PMID: 33807823 PMC: 7967364. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052614.


The Assessment of Psychosocial Work Conditions and Their Relationship to Well-Being: A Multi-Study Report.

Kuczynski I, Madler M, Taibi Y, Lang J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(5).

PMID: 32143337 PMC: 7084600. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051654.


The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study.

Rosario S, Azevedo L, Fonseca J, Nienhaus A, Nubling M, Costa J J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017; 12:24.

PMID: 28808478 PMC: 5550997. DOI: 10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9.


References
1.
Vahtera J, Pentti J, Kivimaki M . Sickness absence as a predictor of mortality among male and female employees. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58(4):321-6. PMC: 1732735. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.011817. View

2.
Kristensen T, Hannerz H, Hogh A, Borg V . The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006; 31(6):438-49. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.948. View

3.
Bellingrath S, Rohleder N, Kudielka B . Healthy working school teachers with high effort-reward-imbalance and overcommitment show increased pro-inflammatory immune activity and a dampened innate immune defence. Brain Behav Immun. 2010; 24(8):1332-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.06.011. View

4.
Hurrell Jr J, Nelson D, Simmons B . Measuring job stressors and strains: where we have been, where we are, and where we need to go. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998; 3(4):368-89. DOI: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.368. View

5.
Kivimaki M, Head J, Ferrie J, Shipley M, Brunner E, Vahtera J . Work stress, weight gain and weight loss: evidence for bidirectional effects of job strain on body mass index in the Whitehall II study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006; 30(6):982-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803229. View