» Articles » PMID: 27086908

Improved Emotional Conflict Control Triggered by the Processing Priority of Negative Emotion

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Apr 19
PMID 27086908
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The prefrontal cortex is responsible for emotional conflict resolution, and this control mechanism is affected by the emotional valence of distracting stimuli. In the present study, we investigated effects of negative and positive stimuli on emotional conflict control using a face-word Stroop task in combination with functional brain imaging. Emotional conflict was absent in the negative face context, in accordance with the null activation observed in areas regarding emotional face processing (fusiform face area, middle temporal/occipital gyrus). Importantly, these visual areas negatively coupled with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). However, the significant emotional conflict was observed in the positive face context, this effect was accompanied by activation in areas associated with emotional face processing, and the default mode network (DMN), here, DLPFC mainly negatively coupled with DMN, rather than visual areas. These results suggested that the conflict control mechanism exerted differently between negative faces and positive faces, it implemented more efficiently in the negative face condition, whereas it is more devoted to inhibiting internal interference in the positive face condition. This study thus provides a plausible mechanism of emotional conflict resolution that the rapid pathway for negative emotion processing efficiently triggers control mechanisms to preventively resolve emotional conflict.

Citing Articles

Using fNIRS to Identify Transparency- and Reliability-Sensitive Markers of Trust Across Multiple Timescales in Collaborative Human-Human-Agent Triads.

Eloy L, Doherty E, Spencer C, Bobko P, Hirshfield L Front Neuroergon. 2024; 3:838625.

PMID: 38235468 PMC: 10790910. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.838625.


Conflict and control in cortical responses to inconsistent emotional signals in a face-word Stroop.

Jamieson G, Page J, Evans I, Hamlin A Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:955171.

PMID: 37457498 PMC: 10349396. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.955171.


It is not always positive: emotional bias in young and older adults.

Viviani G, De Luca F, Antonucci G, Yankouskaya A, Pecchinenda A Psychol Res. 2021; 86(6):2045-2057.

PMID: 34704157 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01614-2.


Regulatory Effects of Reward Anticipation and Target on Attention Processing of Emotional Stimulation.

Yao Y, Xuan Y, Wu R, Sang B Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1170.

PMID: 32581965 PMC: 7283617. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01170.


Effects of Palatable Food Versus Thin Figure Conflicts on Responses of Young Dieting Women.

Chen S, Jackson T, Dong D, Zhuang Q, Chen H Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1025.

PMID: 31178775 PMC: 6538809. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01025.


References
1.
Birk J, Dennis T, Shin L, Urry H . Threat facilitates subsequent executive control during anxious mood. Emotion. 2011; 11(6):1291-304. DOI: 10.1037/a0026152. View

2.
Etkin A, Egner T, Peraza D, Kandel E, Hirsch J . Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron. 2006; 51(6):871-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029. View

3.
Vuilleumier P . How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(12):585-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011. View

4.
Mitchell D, Luo Q, Mondillo K, Vythilingam M, Finger E, Blair R . The interference of operant task performance by emotional distracters: an antagonistic relationship between the amygdala and frontoparietal cortices. Neuroimage. 2008; 40(2):859-868. PMC: 2693278. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.002. View

5.
Said C, Haxby J, Todorov A . Brain systems for assessing the affective value of faces. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366(1571):1660-70. PMC: 3130375. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0351. View