» Articles » PMID: 27084750

Self-assessment of Eligibility for Early Medical Abortion Using M-Health to Calculate Gestational Age in Cape Town, South Africa: a Feasibility Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Apr 17
PMID 27084750
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although abortion is legally available in South Africa, barriers to access exist. Early medical abortion is available to women with a gestational age up to 63 days and timely access is essential. This study aimed to determine women's acceptability and ability to self-assess eligibility for early medical abortion using an online gestational age calculator. Women's acceptability, views and preferences of using mobile technology for gestational age (GA) determination were explored. No previous studies to ascertain the accuracy of online self-administered calculators in a non-clinical setting have been conducted.

Methods: A convenience sample of abortion seekers were recruited from two health care clinics in Cape Town, South Africa in 2014. Seventy-eight women were enrolled and tasked with completing an online self-assessment by entering the first day of their last menstrual period (LMP) onto a website which calculated their GA. A short survey explored the feasibility and acceptability of employing m-Health technology in abortion services. Self-calculated GA was compared with ultrasound gestational age obtained from clinical records.

Results: Participant mean age was 28 (SD 6.8), 41% (32/78) had completed high school and 73% (57/78) reported owning a smart/feature phone. Internet searches for abortion information prior to clinic visit were undertaken by 19/78 (24%) women. Most participants found the online GA calculator easy to use (91%; 71/78); thought the calculation was accurate (86%; 67/78) and that it would be helpful when considering an abortion (94%; 73/78). Eighty-three percent (65/78) reported regular periods and recalled their LMP (71%; 55/78). On average women overestimated GA by 0.5 days (SD 14.5) and first sought an abortion 10 days (SD 14.3) after pregnancy confirmation.

Conclusions: Timely access to information is an essential component of effective abortion services. Advances in the availability of mobile technology represent an opportunity to provide accurate and safe abortion information and services. Our findings indicate that an online GA calculator would be accurate and helpful. GA could be calculated based on LMP recall within an error of 0.5 days, which is not considered clinically significant. An online GA calculator could potentially act as an enabler for women to access safe abortion services sooner.

Citing Articles

Lessons learned from developing and implementing digital health tools for self-managed abortion and sexual and reproductive healthcare in Canada, the United States, and Venezuela.

Luigi-Bravo G, Ramirez A, Gerdts C, Gill R Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023; 31(4):2266305.

PMID: 37870150 PMC: 10595388. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2266305.


The Role of Electronic Health Tools in Unwanted Pregnancy Prevention, Abortion and Post-Abortion Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.

Shahrokhi S, Salmani H, Ahmadi M Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023; 28(5):487-503.

PMID: 37869688 PMC: 10588920. DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_312_20.


Perils and promise providing information on sexual and reproductive health via the Nurse Nisa WhatsApp chatbot in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

McMahon E, Fetters T, Jive N, Mpoyi M Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023; 31(4):2235796.

PMID: 37548472 PMC: 10408565. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2235796.


Telemedicine for Family Planning: A Scoping Review.

Thompson T, Sonalkar S, Butler J, Grossman D Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020; 47(2):287-316.

PMID: 32451019 PMC: 10093687. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.004.


Accuracy of gestational age estimation from last menstrual period among women seeking abortion in South Africa, with a view to task sharing: a mixed methods study.

Constant D, Harries J, Moodley J, Myer L Reprod Health. 2017; 14(1):100.

PMID: 28830534 PMC: 5568056. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0365-7.


References
1.
Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V . Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97(2):189-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01131-5. View

2.
Savitz D, Terry Jr J, Dole N, Thorp Jr J, Siega-Riz A, Herring A . Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187(6):1660-6. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.127601. View

3.
de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R . Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12:CD007459. PMC: 6486189. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2. View

4.
Aubeny E, Peyron R, Turpin C, Renault M, Targosz V, Silvestre L . Termination of early pregnancy (up to 63 days of amenorrhea) with mifepristone and increasing doses of misoprostol [corrected]. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1995; 40 Suppl 2:85-91. View

5.
Blanchard K, Cooper D, Dickson K, Cullingworth L, Mavimbela N, Von Mollendorf C . A comparison of women's, providers' and ultrasound assessments of pregnancy duration among termination of pregnancy clients in South Africa. BJOG. 2007; 114(5):569-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01293.x. View