» Articles » PMID: 27077652

Tomato Fruits Show Wide Phenomic Diversity but Fruit Developmental Genes Show Low Genomic Diversity

Abstract

Domestication of tomato has resulted in large diversity in fruit phenotypes. An intensive phenotyping of 127 tomato accessions from 20 countries revealed extensive morphological diversity in fruit traits. The diversity in fruit traits clustered the accessions into nine classes and identified certain promising lines having desirable traits pertaining to total soluble salts (TSS), carotenoids, ripening index, weight and shape. Factor analysis of the morphometric data from Tomato Analyzer showed that the fruit shape is a complex trait shared by several factors. The 100% variance between round and flat fruit shapes was explained by one discriminant function having a canonical correlation of 0.874 by stepwise discriminant analysis. A set of 10 genes (ACS2, COP1, CYC-B, RIN, MSH2, NAC-NOR, PHOT1, PHYA, PHYB and PSY1) involved in various plant developmental processes were screened for SNP polymorphism by EcoTILLING. The genetic diversity in these genes revealed a total of 36 non-synonymous and 18 synonymous changes leading to the identification of 28 haplotypes. The average frequency of polymorphism across the genes was 0.038/Kb. Significant negative Tajima'D statistic in two of the genes, ACS2 and PHOT1 indicated the presence of rare alleles in low frequency. Our study indicates that while there is low polymorphic diversity in the genes regulating plant development, the population shows wider phenotype diversity. Nonetheless, morphological and genetic diversity of the present collection can be further exploited as potential resources in future.

Citing Articles

Reduced γ-glutamyl hydrolase activity likely contributes to high folate levels in Periyakulam-1 tomato.

Tyagi K, Sunkum A, Gupta P, Kilambi H, Sreelakshmi Y, Sharma R Hortic Res. 2023; 10(1):uhac235.

PMID: 36643736 PMC: 9832877. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac235.


Tomato Phenotypic Diversity Determined by Combined Approaches of Conventional and High-Throughput Tomato Analyzer Phenotyping.

Nankar A, Tringovska I, Grozeva S, Ganeva D, Kostova D Plants (Basel). 2020; 9(2).

PMID: 32033402 PMC: 7076427. DOI: 10.3390/plants9020197.


MutS-Homolog2 silencing generates tetraploid meiocytes in tomato ().

Sarma S, Pandey A, Sharma K, Ravi M, Sreelakshmi Y, Sharma R Plant Direct. 2019; 2(1):e00017.

PMID: 31245679 PMC: 6508528. DOI: 10.1002/pld3.17.


Phytochrome Interacting Factors (PIFs) in Solanum lycopersicum: Diversity, Evolutionary History and Expression Profiling during Different Developmental Processes.

Rosado D, Gramegna G, Cruz A, Lira B, Freschi L, de Setta N PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0165929.

PMID: 27802334 PMC: 5089782. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165929.

References
1.
Beecher G . Nutrient content of tomatoes and tomato products. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1998; 218(2):98-100. DOI: 10.3181/00379727-218-44282a. View

2.
Smith J, Haigh J . The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974; 23(1):23-35. View

3.
Chitwood D, Kumar R, Headland L, Ranjan A, Covington M, Ichihashi Y . A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines. Plant Cell. 2013; 25(7):2465-81. PMC: 3753377. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.112391. View

4.
Liu R . Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention: mechanism of action. J Nutr. 2004; 134(12 Suppl):3479S-3485S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.12.3479S. View

5.
Blomstedt C, Gleadow R, ODonnell N, Naur P, Jensen K, Laursen T . A combined biochemical screen and TILLING approach identifies mutations in Sorghum bicolor L. Moench resulting in acyanogenic forage production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011; 10(1):54-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00646.x. View