» Articles » PMID: 27070714

Common Genetic Variation Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer Does Not Increase Risk of Radiotherapy Toxicity

Abstract

Background: Numerous germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms increase susceptibility to prostate cancer, some lying near genes involved in cellular radiation response. This study investigated whether prostate cancer patients with a high genetic risk have increased toxicity following radiotherapy.

Methods: The study included 1560 prostate cancer patients from four radiotherapy cohorts: RAPPER (n=533), RADIOGEN (n=597), GenePARE (n=290) and CCI (n=150). Data from genome-wide association studies were imputed with the 1000 Genomes reference panel. Individuals were genetically similar with a European ancestry based on principal component analysis. Genetic risks were quantified using polygenic risk scores. Regression models tested associations between risk scores and 2-year toxicity (overall, urinary frequency, decreased stream, rectal bleeding). Results were combined across studies using standard inverse-variance fixed effects meta-analysis methods.

Results: A total of 75 variants were genotyped/imputed successfully. Neither non-weighted nor weighted polygenic risk scores were associated with late radiation toxicity in individual studies (P>0.11) or after meta-analysis (P>0.24). No individual variant was associated with 2-year toxicity.

Conclusion: Patients with a high polygenic susceptibility for prostate cancer have no increased risk for developing late radiotherapy toxicity. These findings suggest that patients with a genetic predisposition for prostate cancer, inferred by common variants, can be safely treated using current standard radiotherapy regimens.

Citing Articles

Moving the Needle Forward in Genomically-Guided Precision Radiation Treatment.

Tam A, Mercier B, Thomas R, Tizpa E, Wong I, Shi J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(22).

PMID: 38001574 PMC: 10669735. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225314.


Quantification of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair foci to evaluate and predict biological responses to ionizing radiation.

Penninckx S, Pariset E, Cekanaviciute E, Costes S NAR Cancer. 2022; 3(4):zcab046.

PMID: 35692378 PMC: 8693576. DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcab046.


Prostate radiotherapy and the risk of secondary rectal cancer-a meta-analysis.

Nugent T, Low E, Fahy M, Donlon N, McCormick P, Mehigan B Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022; 37(2):437-447.

PMID: 35037077 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04075-6.


Harnessing genome-wide association studies to minimize adverse radiation-induced side effects.

Benitez C, Knox S Radiat Oncol J. 2020; 38(4):226-235.

PMID: 33233031 PMC: 7785837. DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00556.


Radiation biology and oncology in the genomic era.

Kerns S, Chuang K, Hall W, Werner Z, Chen Y, Ostrer H Br J Radiol. 2018; 91(1091):20170949.

PMID: 29888979 PMC: 6475928. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170949.


References
1.
Howie B, Marchini J, Stephens M . Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes. G3 (Bethesda). 2012; 1(6):457-70. PMC: 3276165. DOI: 10.1534/g3.111.001198. View

2.
Merino D, Malkin D . p53 and hereditary cancer. Subcell Biochem. 2014; 85:1-16. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9211-0_1. View

3.
Bentzen S, Constine L, Deasy J, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks L . Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76(3 Suppl):S3-9. PMC: 3431964. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040. View

4.
Fachal L, Gomez-Caamano A, Sanchez-Garcia M, Carballo A, Peleteiro P, Lobato-Busto R . TGFβ1 SNPs and radio-induced toxicity in prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2012; 103(2):206-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.01.015. View

5.
Olama A, Kote-Jarai Z, Schumacher F, Wiklund F, Berndt S, Benlloch S . A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies to identify prostate cancer susceptibility loci associated with aggressive and non-aggressive disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2012; 22(2):408-15. PMC: 3526158. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/dds425. View