» Articles » PMID: 27068894

The Impact of Selected Soil Organic Matter Fractions on the PAH Accumulation in the Agricultural Soils from Areas of Different Anthropopressure

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Apr 13
PMID 27068894
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The level of 16PAH accumulation was determined in 75 soil samples collected from two agricultural regions of Poland corresponding to the smallest Polish administrative unit at the LAU 2 level. Both regions are characterised by similar territory and soil cover but different history of pollution and different pressure of anthropogenic factors. Overall accumulation of Σ16PAHs in the upper soil layer was within a wide range with the median value of 291 and 1253 μg kg for a non-contaminated and high anthropopressure region, respectively. Nearly 75 % of the total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) pool was represented by high molecular four-to-six-ring compounds, deriving mainly from combustion sources. The total organic carbon (C) and black carbon (BC) contents were the main parameters associated with the PAH accumulation in soils, and the level of the regional anthropopressure was considered a significant factor. The strongest links of PAHs/BC (r = 0.70, p ≤ 0.05) were found in the region of high anthropopressure, characterized by a relatively high content of BC (up to 45.3 g kg), which tends to heavily adsorb hydrocarbons. In a region of low influence exerted by anthropopressure, the PAH/C or PAH/BC relationships were not observed, which may suggest different diffuse sources of PAH origin and a dominant role of other organic matter fractions in retention of PAHs in soils.

Citing Articles

Restoration of soils contaminated with PAHs by the mixture of zeolite composites mixed with exogenous organic matter and mineral salts.

Szerement J, Kowalski A, Mokrzycki J, Marcinska-Mazur L, Mierzwa-Hersztek M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14227.

PMID: 37648836 PMC: 10469190. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41429-2.


Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Constraints on the Ecobiochemical Status of Cultivated Soils along Transportation Routes.

Zawierucha E, Zawierucha M, Futa B, Mocek-Plociniak A Toxics. 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 37112556 PMC: 10143448. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11040329.


Anthropogenic impact on soils of protected areas-example of PAHs.

Kicinska A, Dmytrowski P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1524.

PMID: 36707668 PMC: 9883476. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28726-6.


Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Black Carbon Screening of Agricultural Soils under Industrial Anthropopressure.

Debaene G, Ukalska-Jaruga A, Smreczak B, Papierowska E Molecules. 2022; 27(21).

PMID: 36364162 PMC: 9658794. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217334.


Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil at Different Depths under a Long-Term Experiment Depending on Fertilization.

Krzebietke S, Mackiewicz-Walec E, Sienkiewicz S, Wierzbowska J, Zaluski D, Borowik A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16).

PMID: 36012095 PMC: 9408199. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610460.


References
1.
Nam J, Thomas G, Jaward F, Steinnes E, Gustafsson O, Jones K . PAHs in background soils from Western Europe: influence of atmospheric deposition and soil organic matter. Chemosphere. 2007; 70(9):1596-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.010. View

2.
Maliszewska-Kordybach B, Smreczak B, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, Terelak H . Monitoring of the total content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in arable soils in Poland. Chemosphere. 2008; 73(8):1284-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.009. View

3.
Bucheli T, Blum F, Desaules A, Gustafsson O . Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, black carbon, and molecular markers in soils of Switzerland. Chemosphere. 2004; 56(11):1061-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.002. View

4.
Lamichhane S, Krishna K, Sarukkalige R . Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) removal by sorption: A review. Chemosphere. 2016; 148:336-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.036. View

5.
He Y, Zhang G . Historical record of black carbon in urban soils and its environmental implications. Environ Pollut. 2009; 157(10):2684-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.019. View