» Articles » PMID: 27065101

Divide and Conquer: Sub-Grouping of ASD Improves ASD Detection Based on Brain Morphometry

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Apr 12
PMID 27065101
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Low success (<60%) in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) classification using brain morphometry from the large multi-site ABIDE dataset and inconsistent findings on brain morphometric abnormalities in ASD can be attributed to the ASD heterogeneity. In this study, we show that ASD brain morphometry is highly heterogeneous, and demonstrate that the heterogeneity can be mitigated and classification improved if autism severity (AS), verbal IQ (VIQ) and age are used with morphometric features. Morphometric features from structural MRIs (sMRIs) of 734 males (ASD: 361, controls: 373) of ABIDE were derived using FreeSurfer. Applying the Random Forest classifier, an AUC of 0.61 was achieved. Adding VIQ and age to morphometric features, AUC improved to 0.68. Sub-grouping the subjects by AS, VIQ and age improved the classification with the highest AUC of 0.8 in the moderate-AS sub-group (AS = 7-8). Matching subjects on age and/or VIQ in each sub-group further improved the classification with the highest AUC of 0.92 in the low AS sub-group (AS = 4-5). AUC decreased with AS and VIQ, and was the lowest in the mid-age sub-group (13-18 years). The important features were mainly from the frontal, temporal, ventricular, right hippocampal and left amygdala regions. However, they highly varied with AS, VIQ and age. The curvature and folding index features from frontal, temporal, lingual and insular regions were dominant in younger subjects suggesting their importance for early detection. When the experiments were repeated using the Gradient Boosting classifier similar results were obtained. Our findings suggest that identifying brain biomarkers in sub-groups of ASD can yield more robust and insightful results than searching across the whole spectrum. Further, it may allow identification of sub-group specific brain biomarkers that are optimized for early detection and monitoring, increasing the utility of sMRI as an important tool for early detection of ASD.

Citing Articles

Exploring the most discriminative brain structural abnormalities in ASD with multi-stage progressive feature refinement approach.

Sun B, Xu Y, Kat S, Sun A, Yin T, Zhao L Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1463654.

PMID: 39483728 PMC: 11524921. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1463654.


Associations between atypical intracortical myelin content and neuropsychological functions in middle to older aged adults with ASD.

Kohli J, Linke A, Martindale I, Wilkinson M, Kinnear M, Lincoln A Brain Behav. 2024; 14(6):e3594.

PMID: 38849980 PMC: 11161394. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3594.


Characterization of a Clinically and Biologically Defined Subgroup of Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Identification of a Tailored Combination Treatment.

Perez-Cano L, Boccuto L, Sirci F, Hidalgo J, Valentini S, Bosio M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38790952 PMC: 11117897. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12050991.


Deep learning based joint fusion approach to exploit anatomical and functional brain information in autism spectrum disorders.

Saponaro S, Lizzi F, Serra G, Mainas F, Oliva P, Giuliano A Brain Inform. 2024; 11(1):2.

PMID: 38194126 PMC: 10776521. DOI: 10.1186/s40708-023-00217-4.


Sampling inequalities affect generalization of neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers in psychiatry.

Chen Z, Hu B, Liu X, Becker B, Eickhoff S, Miao K BMC Med. 2023; 21(1):241.

PMID: 37400814 PMC: 10318841. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02941-4.


References
1.
Betancur C . Etiological heterogeneity in autism spectrum disorders: more than 100 genetic and genomic disorders and still counting. Brain Res. 2010; 1380:42-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.078. View

2.
Glenn O . MR imaging of the fetal brain. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 40(1):68-81. PMC: 3229879. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-009-1459-3. View

3.
Jeste S, Geschwind D . Disentangling the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder through genetic findings. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014; 10(2):74-81. PMC: 4125617. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.278. View

4.
Takao H, Hayashi N, Ohtomo K . Effect of scanner in longitudinal studies of brain volume changes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34(2):438-44. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22636. View

5.
Ecker C, Rocha-Rego V, Johnston P, Mourao-Miranda J, Marquand A, Daly E . Investigating the predictive value of whole-brain structural MR scans in autism: a pattern classification approach. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(1):44-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.024. View