» Articles » PMID: 27060877

Accounting for Interactions and Complex Inter-subject Dependency in Estimating Treatment Effect in Cluster-randomized Trials with Missing Outcomes

Overview
Journal Biometrics
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Apr 11
PMID 27060877
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Semi-parametric methods are often used for the estimation of intervention effects on correlated outcomes in cluster-randomized trials (CRTs). When outcomes are missing at random (MAR), Inverse Probability Weighted (IPW) methods incorporating baseline covariates can be used to deal with informative missingness. Also, augmented generalized estimating equations (AUG) correct for imbalance in baseline covariates but need to be extended for MAR outcomes. However, in the presence of interactions between treatment and baseline covariates, neither method alone produces consistent estimates for the marginal treatment effect if the model for interaction is not correctly specified. We propose an AUG-IPW estimator that weights by the inverse of the probability of being a complete case and allows different outcome models in each intervention arm. This estimator is doubly robust (DR); it gives correct estimates whether the missing data process or the outcome model is correctly specified. We consider the problem of covariate interference which arises when the outcome of an individual may depend on covariates of other individuals. When interfering covariates are not modeled, the DR property prevents bias as long as covariate interference is not present simultaneously for the outcome and the missingness. An R package is developed implementing the proposed method. An extensive simulation study and an application to a CRT of HIV risk reduction-intervention in South Africa illustrate the method.

Citing Articles

Estimating marginal treatment effect in cluster randomized trials with multi-level missing outcomes.

Chang C, Wang R Biometrics. 2024; 80(4).

PMID: 39656746 PMC: 11629964. DOI: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae135.


Analysing cluster randomised controlled trials using GLMM, GEE1, GEE2, and QIF: results from four case studies.

Offorha B, Walters S, Jacques R BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):293.

PMID: 38093221 PMC: 10717070. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02107-z.


Bias-corrected and doubly robust inference for the three-level longitudinal cluster-randomized trials with missing continuous outcomes and small number of clusters: Simulation study and application to a study for adults with serious mental illnesses.

Kang C, Zhang D, Schuster J, Kogan J, Nikolajski C, Reynolds C Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023; 35:101194.

PMID: 37588771 PMC: 10425901. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101194.


Leveraging Contact Network Information in Clustered Randomized Studies of Contagion Processes.

Wang M, Staples P, Prague M, Goyal R, DeGruttola V, Onnela J Obs Stud. 2023; 9(2):157-175.

PMID: 37325081 PMC: 10270696. DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0021.


Sample size calculation for randomized trials via inverse probability of response weighting when outcome data are missing at random.

Harrison L, Wang R Stat Med. 2023; 42(11):1802-1821.

PMID: 36880120 PMC: 10368173. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9700.


References
1.
Vansteelandt S, Rotnitzky A, Robins J . Estimation of regression models for the mean of repeated outcomes under nonignorable nonmonotone nonresponse. Biometrika. 2016; 94(4):841-860. PMC: 4955617. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asm070. View

2.
Hudgens M, Halloran M . Toward Causal Inference With Interference. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008; 103(482):832-842. PMC: 2600548. DOI: 10.1198/016214508000000292. View

3.
Berlin J, Kimmel S, Ten Have T, Sammel M . An empirical comparison of several clustered data approaches under confounding due to cluster effects in the analysis of complications of coronary angioplasty. Biometrics. 2001; 55(2):470-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00470.x. View

4.
Tsiatis A, Davidian M, Zhang M, Lu X . Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach. Stat Med. 2007; 27(23):4658-77. PMC: 2562926. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3113. View

5.
Hubbard A, Ahern J, Fleischer N, van der Laan M, Lippman S, Jewell N . To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology. 2010; 21(4):467-74. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181caeb90. View