» Articles » PMID: 27055901

What Happens to Drinking when Alcohol Policy Changes? A Review of Five Natural Experiments for Alcohol Taxes, Prices, and Availability

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2016 Apr 9
PMID 27055901
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Natural experiments are an important alternative to observational and econometric studies. This paper provides a review of results from empirical studies of alcohol policy interventions in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Hong Kong, Sweden, and Switzerland. Major policy changes were removal of quotas on travelers' tax-free imports and reductions in alcohol taxes. A total of 29 primary articles are reviewed, which contain 35 sets of results for alcohol consumption by various subpopulations and time periods. For each country, the review summarizes and examines: (1) history of tax/quota policy interventions and price changes; (2) graphical trends for alcohol consumption and liver disease mortality; and (3) empirical results for policy effects on alcohol consumption and drinking patterns. We also compare cross-country results for three select outcomes-binge drinking, alcohol consumption by youth and young adults, and heavy consumption by older adults. Overall, we find a lack of consistent results for consumption both within- and across-countries, with a general finding that alcohol tax interventions had selective, rather than broad, impacts on subpopulations and drinking patterns. Policy implications of these findings are discussed.

Citing Articles

Long-term effects of an alcohol prevention program at licensed premises: a Swedish 20-year follow-up study.

Elgan T, Andreasson S, Gripenberg J Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1423708.

PMID: 39171320 PMC: 11335544. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423708.


Assessing the early influence of COVID-19 in an analysis of the immediate implementation of Minimum Pricing for Alcohol on drinkers in Wales.

Holloway K, Buhociu M, Murray S, Livingston W, Perkins A Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2024; 41(1):57-74.

PMID: 38356791 PMC: 10863556. DOI: 10.1177/14550725231202066.


Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Mortality: Prospective Cohort Study.

Li W, Chen D, Peng Y, Lu Z, Kwan M, Tse L JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023; 9:e44073.

PMID: 37669100 PMC: 10509744. DOI: 10.2196/44073.


Reducing alcohol use through alcohol control policies in the general population and population subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kilian C, Lemp J, Llamosas-Falcon L, Carr T, Ye Y, Kerr W EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 59:101996.

PMID: 37256096 PMC: 10225668. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101996.


Do different actors submit different evidence to alcohol advertising policy consultations?.

Stafford J, Pettigrew S, Chikritzhs T Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022; 41(6):1457-1462.

PMID: 35711153 PMC: 9543483. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13503.


References
1.
Nelson J . Estimating the price elasticity of beer: meta-analysis of data with heterogeneity, dependence, and publication bias. J Health Econ. 2013; 33:180-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.11.009. View

2.
Kuo M, Heeb J, Gmel G, Rehm J . Does price matter? The effect of decreased price on spirits consumption in Switzerland. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003; 27(4):720-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000065064.61199.79. View

3.
Anderson P, Chisholm D, Fuhr D . Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Lancet. 2009; 373(9682):2234-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60744-3. View

4.
Wagenaar A, Tobler A, Komro K . Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(11):2270-8. PMC: 2951962. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.186007. View

5.
French M, Popovici I . That instrument is lousy! In search of agreement when using instrumental variables estimation in substance use research. Health Econ. 2009; 20(2):127-46. PMC: 2888657. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1572. View