» Articles » PMID: 27055442

Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring in Children Under 4 years Old

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Apr 9
PMID 27055442
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to study intraoperative spinal cord monitoring (IOM) particularities and performances in children under 4 years old with congenital spinal deformities. IOM is characterized by specific difficulties due to the immaturity of sensory-motor pathways in such young patients. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest dedicated to IOM in this challenging population.

Methods: This study was retrospective and monocentric. 78 IOM in children under 4 years old were analyzed. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), neurogenic mixed evoked potentials (NMEP) and D waves were performed. Patients were classified into one of four categories with respect to IOM data and clinical outcome: true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative. Sensitivity and specificity were then calculated accordingly.

Results: There were 6 true positive, 3 false positive, 67 true negative and 1 false negative outcomes. One patient was characterized by unreliable baseline IOM data. IOM sensitivity was 86 %. IOM specificity was 96 %. The false negative case was monitored using SSEP alone. IOM was difficult in 10/77 cases, being unilateral because of a planned fibular graft harvest. NMEP were characterized by higher signal-to-noise ratio than SSEP.

Conclusions: Immaturity of sensory-motor pathways predominates in the central rather than the peripheral nervous system in young children. MEP and D waves could thus be difficult to obtain. Although non-specific to motor pathways, it could be useful to "by-pass" the brain, using NMEP. In regard to maturational particularities, IOM in children under 4 years old should be performed by experienced neurophysiologists, avoiding in these cases surgeon-guided devices.

Citing Articles

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years.

Angelliaume A, Alhada T, Parent H, Royer J, Harper L Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(9):3072-3076.

PMID: 37434021 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07837-8.


Filum terminale lipomas-the role of intraoperative neuromonitoring.

Lalgudi Srinivasan H, Valdes-Barrera P, Agur A, Soleman J, Ekstein M, Korn A Childs Nerv Syst. 2020; 37(3):931-939.

PMID: 32767104 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04856-4.


[Intraoperative neuromonitoring in cervical deformity surgery].

Shiban E, Meyer B Orthopade. 2018; 47(6):526-529.

PMID: 29623347 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-018-3567-y.

References
1.
Frei F, Ryhult S, Duitmann E, Hasler C, Luetschg J, Erb T . Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials in children undergoing spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(8):911-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259836.84151.75. View

2.
Gavaret M, Trebuchon A, Aubert S, Jacopin S, Blondel B, Glard Y . Intraoperative monitoring in pediatric orthopedic spinal surgery: three hundred consecutive monitoring cases of which 10% of patients were younger than 4 years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(22):1855-63. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f806d9. View

3.
Cheh G, Lenke L, Padberg A, Kim Y, Daubs M, Kuhns C . Loss of spinal cord monitoring signals in children during thoracic kyphosis correction with spinal osteotomy: why does it occur and what should you do?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(10):1093-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f5f73. View

4.
Polirsztok E, Gavaret M, Gsell T, Suprano I, Choufani E, Bollini G . Sublaminar bands: are they safe?. Eur Spine J. 2014; 24(7):1441-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3594-2. View

5.
Drake J, Zeller R, Kulkarni A, Strantzas S, Holmes L . Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010; 26(4):523-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-010-1115-0. View