» Articles » PMID: 27053800

Comparison of Outcome of Tibial Plafond Fractures Managed by Hybrid External Fixation Versus Two-stage Management with Final Plate Fixation

Overview
Journal Indian J Orthop
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Apr 8
PMID 27053800
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tibial platfond fractures are usually associated with massive swelling of the foot and ankle, as well as with open wounds. This swelling may cause significant decrease of the blood flow, so the state of the soft tissue is determinant for the surgical indication and the type of implant. This retrospective study compares the union times in cases of tibial plafond fractures managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure versus those managed with a two stage strategy with final plate fixation.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective study in a polytrauma referral hospital was performed between 2005 and 2011. Patients with a tibial plafond fracture, managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure or managed with a two stage strategy with the final plate fixation were included in the study. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated by two senior surgeons. Fracture healing was defined as callus bridging of one cortex, seen on both lateral and anteroposterior X-ray. The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of 11 points Numerical Rating Scale for pain and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score, assessed at the last followup visit. Thirteen patients had been managed with a hybrid external fixation and 18 with a two-stage strategy with the final plate fixation. There were 14 males and 17 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 19-82 years). The mean followup was 24 months (range 24-70 months).

Results: The mean time from surgery to weight bearing was 7 ± 6.36 days for the hybrid fixation group and 57.43 ± 15.46 days for the plate fixation group (P < 0.0001); and the mean time from fracture to radiological union was 133.82 ± 37.83) and 152.8 ± 72.33 days respectively (P = 0.560).

Conclusion: Besides the differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics of patients, the results of this study suggest that in cases of tibial plafond fractures, the management with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure might involve a faster union than a two-stage management with final plate fixation.

Citing Articles

Functional outcomes and quality of life after surgically treated tibial plateau fractures.

Bagherifard A, Mirkamali S, Rashidi H, Naderi N, Hassanzadeh M, Mohammadpour M BMC Psychol. 2023; 11(1):146.

PMID: 37138311 PMC: 10157953. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01195-2.


Significant Factors of High Performance Outcomes for Tibial Plafond Fractures.

Wheelwright J, Christensen G, Cizik A, Zhang C, Marchand L, Haller J Foot Ankle Int. 2022; 43(10):1261-1268.

PMID: 35869643 PMC: 10563871. DOI: 10.1177/10711007221112924.


Long-term outcomes after operative treatment for tibial pilon fractures.

van der Vliet Q, Ochen Y, McTague M, Weaver M, Hietbrink F, Houwert R OTA Int. 2021; 2(4):e043.

PMID: 33937671 PMC: 7997126. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000043.


Influence of reduction quality on functional outcome and quality of life in treatment of tibial plafond fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Privalov M, Euler F, Keil H, Swartman B, Beisemann N, Franke J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):534.

PMID: 31722696 PMC: 6854804. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2932-2.


A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following external fixation or open reduction internal fixation for distal intra-articular tibial fractures: an update.

Erichsen J, Andersen P, Viberg B, Jensen C, Damborg F, Froberg L Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019; 29(4):907-917.

PMID: 30739163 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02368-9.


References
1.
Gustilo R, Anderson J . Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(4):453-8. View

2.
Blauth M, Bastian L, Krettek C, Knop C, Evans S . Surgical options for the treatment of severe tibial pilon fractures: a study of three techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(3):153-60. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200103000-00002. View

3.
Ristiniemi J . External fixation of tibial pilon fractures and fracture healing. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2007; 78(326):3, 5-34. View

4.
Testroote M, Stigter W, Janssen L, Janzing H . Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with lower-leg immobilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (4):CD006681. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006681.pub3. View

5.
Richard R, Kubiak E, Horwitz D . Techniques for the surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014; 45(3):295-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2014.04.001. View