» Articles » PMID: 27051164

Computed Tomography Imaging Parameters for Inhomogeneity Correction in Radiation Treatment Planning

Overview
Journal J Med Phys
Date 2016 Apr 7
PMID 27051164
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Modern treatment planning systems provide accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media (such as a patient' body) with the help of tissue characterization based on computed tomography (CT) number. However, CT number depends on the type of scanner, tube voltage, field of view (FOV), reconstruction algorithm including artifact reduction and processing filters. The impact of these parameters on CT to electron density (ED) conversion had been subject of investigation for treatment planning in various clinical situations. This is usually performed with a tissue characterization phantom with various density plugs acquired with different tube voltages (kilovoltage peak), FOV reconstruction and different scanners to generate CT number to ED tables. This article provides an overview of inhomogeneity correction in the context of CT scanning and a new evaluation tool, difference volume dose-volume histogram (DVH), dV-DVH. It has been concluded that scanner and CT parameters are important for tissue characterizations, but changes in ED are minimal and only pronounced for higher density materials. For lungs, changes in CT number are minimal among scanners and CT parameters. Dosimetric differences for lung and prostate cases are usually insignificant (<2%) in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and < 5% for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with CT parameters. It could be concluded that CT number variability is dependent on acquisition parameters, but its dosimetric impact is pronounced only in high-density media and possibly in IMRT. In view of such small dosimetric changes in low-density medium, the acquisition of additional CT data for financially difficult clinics and countries may not be warranted.

Citing Articles

Investigation of the Effect of Calibration Curves Obtained from Different Computed Tomography Devices on the Dose Distribution of Tomotherapy Plans.

Demir H, Gul O, Kanyilmaz G J Med Phys. 2025; 49(4):545-550.

PMID: 39926133 PMC: 11801095. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_129_24.


Accuracy of the Hounsfield Unit Values Measured by Implant Planning Software.

Nagata K, Kouzai Y, Inaba K, Fujii M, Atsumi M, Kimoto K Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727470 PMC: 11674854. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120413.


Diagnosis of Osteoporosis by Quantifying Volumetric Bone Mineral Density of Lumbar Vertebrae Using Abdominal CT Images and Two-Compartment Model.

Hsu P, Luzhbin D, Shih T, Wu J Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 36833090 PMC: 9957021. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040556.


Towards Accurate and Precise Image-Guided Radiotherapy: Clinical Applications of the MR-Linac.

Randall J, Rammohan N, Das I, Yadav P J Clin Med. 2022; 11(14).

PMID: 35887808 PMC: 9324978. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144044.


Improved accuracy of relative electron density and proton stopping power ratio through CycleGAN machine learning.

Scholey J, Vinas L, Kearney V, Yom S, Larson P, Descovich M Phys Med Biol. 2022; 67(10).

PMID: 35417903 PMC: 9121765. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac6725.


References
1.
Ahnesjo A, Saxner M, Trepp A . A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation. Med Phys. 1992; 19(2):263-73. DOI: 10.1118/1.596856. View

2.
Morgan A, Knoos T, McNee S, Evans C, Thwaites D . Clinical implications of the implementation of advanced treatment planning algorithms for thoracic treatments. Radiother Oncol. 2007; 86(1):48-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.11.033. View

3.
Sontag M, Cunningham J . The equivalent tissue-air ratio method for making absorbed dose calculations in a heterogeneous medium. Radiology. 1978; 129(3):787-94. DOI: 10.1148/129.3.787. View

4.
Mackie T, Battista J, Scrimger J, Van Dyk J, Cunningham J . Lung dose corrections for 6- and 15-MV x rays. Med Phys. 1985; 12(3):327-32. DOI: 10.1118/1.595691. View

5.
Sontag M, Cunningham J . Corrections to absorbed dose calculations for tissue inhomogeneities. Med Phys. 1977; 4(5):431-6. DOI: 10.1118/1.594329. View