» Articles » PMID: 27050303

Errors Disrupt Subsequent Early Attentional Processes

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Apr 7
PMID 27050303
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been demonstrated that target detection is impaired following an error in an unrelated flanker task. These findings support the idea that the occurrence or processing of unexpected error-like events interfere with subsequent information processing. In the present study, we investigated the effect of errors on early visual ERP components. We therefore combined a flanker task and a visual discrimination task. Additionally, the intertrial interval between both tasks was manipulated in order to investigate the duration of these negative after-effects. The results of the visual discrimination task indicated that the amplitude of the N1 component, which is related to endogenous attention, was significantly decreased following an error, irrespective of the intertrial interval. Additionally, P3 amplitude was attenuated after an erroneous trial, but only in the long-interval condition. These results indicate that low-level attentional processes are impaired after errors.

Citing Articles

A sensorimotor control framework for understanding emotional communication and regulation.

Williams J, Huggins C, Zupan B, Willis M, Van Rheenen T, Sato W Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020; 112:503-518.

PMID: 32070695 PMC: 7505116. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.014.


Cortical beta power reflects decision dynamics and uncovers multiple facets of post-error adaptation.

Fischer A, Nigbur R, Klein T, Danielmeier C, Ullsperger M Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):5038.

PMID: 30487572 PMC: 6261941. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07456-8.


Rapid adaptive adjustments of selective attention following errors revealed by the time course of steady-state visual evoked potentials.

Steinhauser M, Andersen S Neuroimage. 2018; 186:83-92.

PMID: 30366075 PMC: 6347567. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.059.


Common mechanisms in error monitoring and action effect monitoring.

Steinhauser R, Wirth R, Kunde W, Janczyk M, Steinhauser M Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018; 18(6):1159-1171.

PMID: 30069791 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0628-y.


Monitoring and control in multitasking.

Schuch S, Dignath D, Steinhauser M, Janczyk M Psychon Bull Rev. 2018; 26(1):222-240.

PMID: 30066081 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1512-z.


References
1.
Bombeke K, Schouppe N, Duthoo W, Notebaert W . The effect of alcohol and placebo on post-error adjustments. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:3. PMC: 3555120. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00003. View

2.
Maier M, Yeung N, Steinhauser M . Error-related brain activity and adjustments of selective attention following errors. Neuroimage. 2011; 56(4):2339-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.083. View

3.
Stevens M, Lammertyn J, Verbruggen F, Vandierendonck A . Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS windows platform. Behav Res Methods. 2006; 38(2):280-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03192779. View

4.
Luck S, Heinze H, Mangun G, Hillyard S . Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990; 75(6):528-42. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90139-b. View

5.
Babiloni F, Cincotti F, Carducci F, Rossini P, Babiloni C . Spatial enhancement of EEG data by surface Laplacian estimation: the use of magnetic resonance imaging-based head models. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(5):724-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00494-1. View