» Articles » PMID: 27048635

Cancer and Non-cancer Mortality Among French Uranium Cycle Workers: the TRACY Cohort

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Apr 7
PMID 27048635
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The health effects of internal contamination by radionuclides, and notably by uranium, are poorly characterised. New cohorts of uranium workers are needed to better examine these effects. This paper analyses for the first time the mortality profile of the French cohort of uranium cycle workers. It considers mortality from cancer and non-cancer causes.

Methods: The cohort includes workers employed at least 6 months between 1958 and 2006 in French companies involved in the production of nuclear fuel. Vital status and causes of death were collected from French national registries. Workers were followed-up from 1 January 1968 to 31 December 2008. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed based on mortality rates for the French general population.

Results: The cohort includes 12,649 workers (88% men). The average length of follow-up is 27 years and the mean age at the end of the study is 60 years. Large mortality deficits are observed for non-cancer causes of death such as non-cancer respiratory diseases (SMR=0.51 (0.41 to 0.63)) and circulatory diseases (SMR=0.68 (0.62 to 0.74)). A mortality deficit of lower magnitude is also observed for all cancers combined (SMR (95% CI): 0.76 (0.71 to 0.81)). Pleural mesothelioma is elevated (SMR=2.04 (1.19 to 3.27)).

Conclusions: A healthy worker effect is observed in this new cohort of workers involved in the uranium cycle. Collection of individual information on internal uranium exposure as well as other risk factors is underway, to allow for the investigation of uranium-related risks.

Citing Articles

Renal toxicity and biokinetics models after repeated uranium instillation.

De Castro L, Manoury A, Claude O, Simoneau B, Monceau V, Suhard D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4111.

PMID: 36914734 PMC: 10011524. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31073-1.


Health Effects of Particulate Uranium Exposure.

Zhang L, Chu J, Xia B, Xiong Z, Zhang S, Tang W Toxics. 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36287855 PMC: 9610560. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100575.


Deep Breaths: A Systematic Review of the Potential Effects of Employment in the Nuclear Industry on Mortality from Non-Malignant Respiratory Disease.

Milder C, Howard S, Ellis E, Deppen S Radiat Res. 2022; 198(4):396-429.

PMID: 35943867 PMC: 9704034. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-21-00014.1.


Relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and mesothelioma risk: A systematic review of the scientific literature and meta-analysis.

Visci G, Rizzello E, Zunarelli C, Violante F, Boffetta P Cancer Med. 2022; 11(3):778-789.

PMID: 35029060 PMC: 8817084. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4436.


Non-cancer disease prevalence and association with occupational radiation exposure among Korean radiation workers.

Park S, Lee D, Jin Y, Cha E, Jang W, Park S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22415.

PMID: 34789809 PMC: 8599676. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01875-2.


References
1.
Chan C, Hughes T, Muldoon S, Aldrich T, Rice C, Hornung R . Mortality patterns among Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2010; 52(7):725-32. PMC: 2983475. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181e48ee0. View

2.
Pinheiro G, Antao V, Bang K, Attfield M . Malignant mesothelioma surveillance: a comparison of ICD 10 mortality data with SEER incidence data in nine areas of the United States. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2004; 10(3):251-5. DOI: 10.1179/oeh.2004.10.3.251. View

3.
Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C . The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk Among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: design, epidemiological methods and descriptive results. Radiat Res. 2007; 167(4):361-79. DOI: 10.1667/RR0554.1. View

4.
Baillargeon J . Characteristics of the healthy worker effect. Occup Med. 2001; 16(2):359-66. View

5.
Metz-Flamant C, Guseva Canu I, Laurier D . Malignant pleural mesothelioma risk among nuclear workers: a review. J Radiol Prot. 2011; 31(1):9-23. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/31/1/R01. View