» Articles » PMID: 27047767

Overestimate of Fibrosis by FIBROSpect® II in African Americans Complicates the Management of Their Chronic Hepatitis C

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2016 Apr 6
PMID 27047767
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evaluation of advanced fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is used to facilitate decisions on treatment strategy and to initiate additional screening measures. Unfortunately, most studies have predominately Caucasian (Cau) patients and may not be as relevant for African Americans (AA).

Aims: This study specifically addresses the issue of defining minimal vs. significant fibrosis in African Americans (AA) with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) using noninvasive assays.

Methods: All patients (n = 319) seen between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2013 for whom a FibroSpect II® (FSII) assay was performed and had data for calculation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) were identified using the medical records.

Results: When liver biopsy score and FSII assay results for the AA patients with CHC were compared, 31% of AA had advanced FSII fibrosis scores (F2-F4) despite a biopsy score of F0-F1. In contrast, 10% of Cau over-scored. The AA false positive rate was 14% for APRI and 34% for FIB-4. Combining FSII with either APRI (7% false positive) or FIB-4 (10% false positive) improved the false positive rate in AA to 7% (FSII + APRI) and 10% (FSII + FIB-4) but reduced the sensitivity for significant fibrosis.

Conclusions: The FSII assay overestimates fibrosis in AA and should be used with caution since these patients may not have significant fibrosis. If the APRI or FIB-4 assay is combined with the FSII assay, minimal fibrosis in AA can be defined without subjecting the patients to a subsequent biopsy.

References
1.
Gara N, Zhao X, Kleiner D, Liang T, Hoofnagle J, Ghany M . Discordance among transient elastography, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, and histologic assessments of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 11(3):303-8.e1. PMC: 3642246. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.044. View

2.
Talaat N, Yapali S, Fontana R, Conjeevaram H, Lok A . Changes in characteristics of hepatitis C patients seen in a liver centre in the United States during the last decade. J Viral Hepat. 2014; 22(5):481-8. DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12343. View

3.
Zarski J, Sturm N, Guechot J, Zafrani E, Vaubourdolle M, Thoret S . Contribution of the ELFG test in algorithms of non-invasive markers towards the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59088. PMC: 3605459. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059088. View

4.
Patel K, Benhamou Y, Yoshida E, Kaita K, Zeuzem S, Torbenson M . An independent and prospective comparison of two commercial fibrosis marker panels (HCV FibroSURE and FIBROSpect II) during albinterferon alfa-2b combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2009; 16(3):178-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01062.x. View

5.
Shiffman M, Benhamou Y . Patients with HCV and F1 and F2 fibrosis stage: treat now or wait?. Liver Int. 2013; 33 Suppl 1:105-10. DOI: 10.1111/liv.12066. View