NEW BEARING SURFACES IN TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT

Overview

Journal Rev Bras Ortop

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2016 Apr 5

PMID 27042614

Citations 5

Authors

Carlos Roberto Schwartsmann

Leonardo Carbonera Boschin

Ramiro Zilles Goncalves

Anthony Kerbes Yepez

Leandro de Freitas Spinelli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty is being increasingly indicated for younger and more active patients, in addition to a naturally growing demand for the procedure because of increasing life expectancy among patients. The high costs of this surgery and the controversies regarding implant performance have made this topic the subject of constant research, seeking new materials with better resistance to wear and better biocompatibility. The present article provides a review of new surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.

Citing Articles

Total Hip Arthroplasty for the Sequelae of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Pediatric Patient.

Fassihi S, Mortman R, Shalkevich J, Lee D, Stoll W, Thakkar S Arthroplast Today. 2020; 6(3):296-304.

PMID: 32509942 PMC: 7264979. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.04.012.

Scaffolding Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications.

Pina S, Ribeiro V, Marques C, Maia F, Silva T, Reis R Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(11).

PMID: 31195642 PMC: 6600968. DOI: 10.3390/ma12111824.

Importance of preclinical evaluation of wear in hip implant designs using simulator machines.

Trommer R, Maru M Rev Bras Ortop. 2017; 52(3):251-259.

PMID: 28702381 PMC: 5496994. DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.07.004.

Correlation of Cup Inclination Angle with Liner Wear for Metal-on-polyethylene in Hip Primary Arthroplasty.

Tian J, Sun L, Hu R, Han W, Tian X Orthop Surg. 2017; 9(2):186-190.

PMID: 28557297 PMC: 6584387. DOI: 10.1111/os.12337.

Total hip arthroplasty complications in patients with or without controlled diabetes mellitus during hospitalization.

Falcao F, Dias B, Wolfovitch L, Sadigursky D Rev Bras Ortop. 2016; 51(5):589-596.

PMID: 27818982 PMC: 5091018. DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.016.

References

Smith S, Estok 2nd D, Harris W . 20-year experience with cemented primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty using so-called second-generation cementing techniques in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(3):263-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90463-7. View

Tharani R, Dorey F, Schmalzried T . The risk of cancer following total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(5):774-80. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200105000-00019. View

Duffy G, Berry D, Rowland C, Cabanela M . Primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients <40 years old: 10- to 14-year results using first-generation proximally porous-coated implants. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(8 Suppl 1):140-4. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.28716. View

Berry D, Harmsen W, Cabanela M, Morrey B . Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(2):171-7. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00002. View

Keener J, Callaghan J, Goetz D, Pederson D, Sullivan P, Johnston R . Twenty-five-year results after Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(6):1066-72. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200306000-00013. View

Amstutz H, Beaule P, Dorey F, Le Duff M, Campbell P, Gruen T . Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(1):28-39. View

Callaghan J, Templeton J, Liu S, Pedersen D, Goetz D, Sullivan P . Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(4):690-5. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00004. View

Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzried T . Bearing surface options for total hip replacement in young patients. Instr Course Lect. 2004; 53:49-65. View

Buckwalter A, Callaghan J, Liu S, Pedersen D, Goetz D, Sullivan P . Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(7):1481-5. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00818. View

10.

Levine B, Della Valle C, Jacobs J . Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14(12):646-55. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200611000-00008. View

11.

Paulsen A, Pedersen A, Johnsen S, Riis A, Lucht U, Overgaard S . Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in younger patients: findings from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78(5):622-8. DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014310. View

12.

Gandhi R, Davey J, Mahomed N . Hydroxyapatite coated femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(1):38-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.299. View

13.

Camazzola D, Hammond T, Gandhi R, Davey J . A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a 13-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(1):33-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.129. View

14.

Wroblewski B, Siney P, Fleming P . Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty: follow-up for 30 to 40 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(4):447-50. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.21933. View

15.

Jarrett C, Ranawat A, Bruzzone M, Blum Y, Rodriguez J, Ranawat C . The squeaking hip: a phenomenon of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(6):1344-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00970. View

16.

Garbuz D, Tanzer M, Greidanus N, Masri B, Duncan C . The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(2):318-25. PMC: 2806981. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1029-x. View

17.

Jafari S, Bender B, Coyle C, Parvizi J, Sharkey P, Hozack W . Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(2):459-65. PMC: 2807006. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1090-5. View

18.

Kwon Y, Thomas P, Summer B, Pandit H, Taylor A, Beard D . Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2009; 28(4):444-50. DOI: 10.1002/jor.21015. View

19.

Lingaraj K, Teo Y, Bergman N . The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(12):1555-60. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22517. View

20.

Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon Y, Doll H, Gill H, Murray D . Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(12):1566-74. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22287. View