» Articles » PMID: 27042517

Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) V/s Modified Bassini's Repair (MBR) + Lichtenstein Mesh Repair of Direct Inguinal Hernias in Rural Population - A Comparative Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Apr 5
PMID 27042517
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Lichtenstein's tension free mesh hernioplasty is the commonly done open technique for inguinal hernias. As our hospital is in rural area, majority of patients are labourers, open hernias are commonly done. The present study was done by comparing Lichtenstein Mesh Repair (LMR) v/s Modified Bassini's repair (MBR) + Lichtenstein mesh repair (LMR) of direct Inguinal Hernias to compare the technique of both surgeries and its outcome like postoperative complications and recurrence rate.

Materials And Methods: A comparative randomized study was conducted on patients reporting to MNR hospital, sangareddy with direct inguinal hernias. A total of fifty consecutive patients were included in this study of which, 25 patients were operated by LMR and 25 patients were operated by MBR+LMR and followed up for a period of two years. The outcomes of the both techniques were compared.

Results: Study involved 25 each of Lichtenstein's mesh repair (LMR) and modified bassini's repair (MBR) + LMR, over a period of 2 years. The duration of surgery for lichtenstein mesh repair is around 34.56 min compared to LMR+MBR, which is 47.56 min which was statistically significant (p-value is <0.0001). In this study the most common complication for both the groups was seroma. The pain was relatively higher in LMR+MBR group in POD 1, but not statistically significant (p-value is 0.0949) and from POD 7 the pain was almost similar in both groups. The recurrence rate is 2% for LMR and 0% for MBR+LMR.

Conclusion: LMR+MBR was comparatively better than only LMR in all direct inguinal hernias because of low recurrence rate (0%) and low postoperative complications, which showed in our present study.

Citing Articles

Modified Halsted's operation for inguinal hernia repair: A new technique.

Alomar O Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 71:102968.

PMID: 34712482 PMC: 8529394. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102968.


A Strangulated Meckel's Diverticulum in an Inguinal Hernia: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Johnson G, Holden J, Helewa R, Hochman D, Hyun E Int Med Case Rep J. 2021; 14:605-609.

PMID: 34512042 PMC: 8421327. DOI: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S325390.

References
1.
Breivik E, Bjornsson G, Skovlund E . A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000; 16(1):22-8. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00005. View

2.
Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Andersen F, Wara P . Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet. 2001; 358(9288):1124-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06251-1. View

3.
Lundeberg T, Lund I, Dahlin L, Borg E, Gustafsson C, Sandin L . Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments. J Rehabil Med. 2002; 33(6):279-83. DOI: 10.1080/165019701753236473. View

4.
Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E . Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg. 2002; 168(1):22-8. DOI: 10.1080/110241502317307535. View

5.
ODwyer P, Serpell M, Millar K, Paterson C, Young D, Hair A . Local or general anesthesia for open hernia repair: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2003; 237(4):574-9. PMC: 1514474. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000059992.76731.64. View