Increasing Public Support for Food-industry Related, Obesity Prevention Policies: The Role of a Taste-engineering Frame and Contextualized Values
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Support for policies to combat obesity is often undermined by a public sense that obesity is largely a matter of personal responsibility. Industry rhetoric is a major contributor to this perception, as the soda/fast food/big food companies emphasize choice and individual agency in their efforts to neutralize policies that are burdensome. Yet obesity experts recognize that environmental forces play a major role in obesity. We investigate whether exposure to a taste-engineering frame increases support for food and beverage policies that address obesity. A taste-engineering frame details strategies used by the food industry to engineer preferences and increase the over-consumption of processed foods and sugary beverages. We also examine the effects of exposure to two contextualized values that have recently been promoted in expert discourse-consumer knowledge and consumer safety - on public support of policies. Our research shows how causal frames and contextualized values may effectively produce support for new obesity policies.
Methods: We use an online survey experiment to test the effects of exposure to a taste-engineering frame (TEF), the value of consumer knowledge (CK), or the value of consumer safety (CS), on level of support for a range of policies. A random sample of adults, age 18 + living in the United States was included in the study (N = 2580). Ordered logistic regression was used to measure the effects of treatment exposure. The primary outcome was level-of-support for four (4) food-industry related, obesity prevention policies (aka food and beverage policies): 1) require food-manufacturers to disclose the amount of additives in food products on food packaging; 2) require food-manufacturers to advertise food products in accordance with their actual nutritional value; 3) prohibit all high-fat, high-sugar food advertising on television programming watched primarily by children; and 4) increase healthy food availability in work sites, schools, and hospitals.
Findings: These data suggest that a taste-engineering frame and contextualized values significantly increase public support for many of the food and beverage policies tested.
Conclusions: Applying a taste-engineering frame and/or contextualized values to address obesity advances a population-based policy agenda to counteract the effects of food-industry strategies.
Ortiz S, Fenelon A, Chavehpour Y Health Aff (Millwood). 2024; 43(2):287-296.
PMID: 38315934 PMC: 11846682. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01051.
Berkemeyer S, Wehrmann J Obes Pillars. 2023; 4:100042.
PMID: 37990669 PMC: 10661968. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100042.
Prescott S, DAdamo C, Holton K, Ortiz S, Overby N, Logan A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(15).
PMID: 37569002 PMC: 10419141. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20156461.
The Founder: Dispositional Greed, Showbiz, and the Commercial Determinants of Health.
Logan A, DAdamo C, Prescott S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(9).
PMID: 37174136 PMC: 10178243. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20095616.
Earth Dreams: Reimagining ARPA for Health of People, Places and Planet.
Logan A, Berman B, Prescott S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(23).
PMID: 34886514 PMC: 8657388. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312788.