» Articles » PMID: 27023739

The Sensitivity of Children with SLI to Phonotactic Probabilities During Lexical Access

Overview
Journal J Commun Disord
Date 2016 Mar 30
PMID 27023739
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The procedural deficit hypothesis (Ullman & Pierpont, 2005) has been proposed to account for the combination of linguistic and nonlinguistic deficits observed in specific language impairment (SLI). According to this proposal, SLI results from a deficit in procedural memory that prevents children from developing sensitivity to probabilistic sequences, amongst other deficits. We tested the ability of children with SLI to rely on a specific type of probabilities characterizing sequences that occur in a given language: phonotactic probabilities. Twenty French-speaking children with SLI (M=10;1), 20 typically developing children matched for chronological age (M=10;0) and 20 typically developing children matched for receptive vocabulary (M=7;4) performed an auditory lexical decision task. Pseudoword stimuli were built with combinations of either frequently associated phonemes (high phonotactic probability) or infrequently associated phonemes (low phonotactic probability). Phonotactic probabilities had a significant impact on the accuracy and speed of pseudoword rejection in children with SLI, but not in the two control groups. SLI children's greater reliance on phonotactic probabilities relative to typically developing children appears to contradict the PD hypothesis. Phonotactic probabilities may help them to partially overcome their difficulties in developing and accessing the phonological lexicon during spoken word recognition.

Learning Outcomes: After reading this article, readers will understand the importance of sensitivity to phonotactic probabilities in language processing. They will also learn that such sensitivity is preserved in children with SLI. Finally, readers will understand that children with SLI are more prone to use phonotactic information when accessing their lexicon than typically-developing children.

Citing Articles

A developmental account of the role of sequential dependencies in typical and atypical language learners.

Goffman L, Gerken L Cogn Neuropsychol. 2023; 40(5-6):243-264.

PMID: 37963089 PMC: 10939949. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2023.2275837.


Explicit Instructions Do Not Enhance Auditory Statistical Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.

Soares A, Gutierrez-Dominguez F, Oliveira H, Lages A, Guerra N, Pereira A Front Psychol. 2022; 13:905762.

PMID: 35846717 PMC: 9282164. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905762.


Contributions of early motor deficits in predicting language outcomes among preschoolers with developmental language disorder.

Sack L, Dollaghan C, Goffman L Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021; 24(4):362-374.

PMID: 34793281 PMC: 9881565. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2021.1998629.


Not All Procedural Learning Tasks Are Difficult for Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.

Gerken L, Plante E, Goffman L J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; 64(3):922-934.

PMID: 33592156 PMC: 8608183. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00548.


Neighborhood Density and Syntactic Class Effects on Spoken Word Recognition: Specific Language Impairment and Typical Development.

Hoover J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018; 61(5):1226-1237.

PMID: 29800356 PMC: 6195083. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0099.