Status Competition, Inequality, and Fertility: Implications for the Demographic Transition

Overview

Journal Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci

Specialty Biology

Date 2016 Mar 30

PMID 27022077

Citations 25

Authors

Mary K Shenk

Hillard S Kaplan

Paul L Hooper

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The role that social status plays in small-scale societies suggests that status may be important for understanding the evolution of human fertility decisions, and for understanding how such decisions play out in modern contexts. This paper explores whether modelling competition for status--in the sense of relative rank within a society--can help shed light on fertility decline and the demographic transition. We develop a model of how levels of inequality and status competition affect optimal investment by parents in the embodied capital (health, strength, and skills) and social status of offspring, focusing on feedbacks between individual decisions and socio-ecological conditions. We find that conditions similar to those in demographic transition societies yield increased investment in both embodied capital and social status, generating substantial decreases in fertility, particularly under conditions of high inequality and intense status competition. We suggest that a complete explanation for both fertility variation in small-scale societies and modern fertility decline will take into account the effects of status competition and inequality.

Citing Articles

Young people on social media in a globalized world: self-optimization in highly competitive and achievement-oriented forms of life.

Butler S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1340605.

PMID: 39035080 PMC: 11258645. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340605.

From the Ground Up: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Past Fertility and Population Narratives.

McFadden C Hum Nat. 2023; 34(3):476-500.

PMID: 37723407 PMC: 10543153. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-023-09459-x.

Adoption, Fostering, and Parental Absence in Vanuatu.

Brandl E, Emmott E, Mace R Hum Nat. 2023; 34(3):422-455.

PMID: 37642860 PMC: 10543845. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-023-09456-0.

Fertility intentions and outcomes in Indonesia: Evolutionary perspectives on sexual conflict.

Snopkowski K, Nelson J Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 3:e33.

PMID: 37588532 PMC: 10427277. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2021.27.

Disentangling wealth effects on fertility in 64 low- and middle-income countries.

Hackman J, Hruschka D Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 2:e58.

PMID: 37588348 PMC: 10427476. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2020.62.

References

Gurven , Hill , HURTADO . "It's a Wonderful Life". signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay. Evol Hum Behav. 2000; 21(4):263-282. DOI: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00032-5. View

Borgerhoff Mulder M . Optimizing offspring: the quantity-quality tradeoff in agropastoral Kipsigis. Evol Hum Behav. 2001; 21(6):391-410. DOI: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00054-4. View

Low B, Simon C, Anderson K . An evolutionary ecological perspective on demographic transitions: modeling multiple currencies. Am J Hum Biol. 2002; 14(2):149-67. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.10043. View

Kaplan H, Lancaster J, Tucker W, Anderson K . Evolutionary approach to below replacement fertility. Am J Hum Biol. 2002; 14(2):233-56. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.10041. View

Strassmann B, Gillespie B . Life-history theory, fertility and reproductive success in humans. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1491):553-62. PMC: 1690939. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1912. View

Sugiyama L . Illness, injury, and disability among Shiwiar forager-horticulturalists: implications of health-risk buffering for the evolution of human life history. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004; 123(4):371-89. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10325. View

Carneiro R . A Theory of the Origin of the State: Traditional theories of state origins are considered and rejected in favor of a new ecological hypothesis. Science. 1970; 169(3947):733-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.169.3947.733. View

Gillespie D, Russell A, Lummaa V . When fecundity does not equal fitness: evidence of an offspring quantity versus quality trade-off in pre-industrial humans. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 275(1635):713-22. PMC: 2366115. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1000. View

Nettle D, Pollet T . Natural selection on male wealth in humans. Am Nat. 2008; 172(5):658-66. DOI: 10.1086/591690. View

10.

Borgerhoff Mulder M, Bowles S, Hertz T, Bell A, Beise J, Clark G . Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science. 2009; 326(5953):682-8. PMC: 2792081. DOI: 10.1126/science.1178336. View

11.

Lawson D, Mace R . Optimizing Modern Family Size: Trade-offs between Fertility and the Economic Costs of Reproduction. Hum Nat. 2010; 21(1):39-61. PMC: 2847167. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-010-9080-6. View

12.

von Rueden C, Gurven M, Kaplan H . Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1715):2223-32. PMC: 3107626. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2145. View

13.

Smith E, Hill K, Marlowe F, Nolin D, Wiessner P, Gurven M . Wealth transmission and inequality among hunter-gatherers. Curr Anthropol. 2010; 51(1):19-34. PMC: 2999363. DOI: 10.1086/648530. View

14.

Kaptijn R, Thomese F, van Tilburg T, Liefbroer A . How Grandparents Matter: Support for the Cooperative Breeding Hypothesis in a Contemporary Dutch Population. Hum Nat. 2011; 21(4):393-405. PMC: 2995872. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-010-9098-9. View

15.

Majolo B, Lehmann J, de Bortoli Vizioli A, Schino G . Fitness-related benefits of dominance in primates. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012; 147(4):652-60. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22031. View

16.

Goodman A, Koupil I, Lawson D . Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society. Proc Biol Sci. 2012; 279(1746):4342-51. PMC: 3479798. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1415. View

17.

Lawson D, Alvergne A, Gibson M . The life-history trade-off between fertility and child survival. Proc Biol Sci. 2012; 279(1748):4755-64. PMC: 3497086. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1635. View

18.

Cheng J, Tracy J, Foulsham T, Kingstone A, Henrich J . Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 104(1):103-25. DOI: 10.1037/a0030398. View

19.

van Noordwijk M, van Schaik C . The effects of dominance rank and group size on female lifetime reproductive success in wild long-tailed macaques,Macaca fascicularis. Primates. 2012; 40(1):105-30. DOI: 10.1007/BF02557705. View

20.

Shenk M, Towner M, Kress H, Alam N . A model comparison approach shows stronger support for economic models of fertility decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(20):8045-50. PMC: 3657819. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1217029110. View