» Articles » PMID: 27020597

Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Combined with Mechanical Ventilation for Treating Patients Aged > 60 Years in Cardiogenic Shock: Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Journal J Int Med Res
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Mar 30
PMID 27020597
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine if mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) combined with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) provided a better outcome than IABP alone for the treatment of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction in patients aged > 60 years.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from patients in cardiogenic shock, refractory to pharmacological therapy and treated at a geriatric coronary care unit.

Results: Sixty-two patients were eligible for study inclusion: 33 received IABP alone; 29 received IABP combined with mechanical ventilation. Patients in the IABP + mechanical ventilation group had lower mean arterial blood pressure (BP), systolic BP and partial pressure of oxygen compared with the IABP group, indicating worse cardiac and pulmonary function. In addition, higher rates of pulmonary infection and renal insufficiency were observed in the IABP + mechanical ventilation group than in the IABP group. A statistically significant improvement of left ventricular function before and after treatment was observed in the IABP + mechanical ventilation group, but not in the IABP group. Pulmonary infection and renal insufficiency were risk factors for all-cause in-hospital mortality; successful revascularization was a negative risk factor. There was no between-group difference in survival.

Conclusion: Mechanical ventilation with an appropriate level of PEEP appears to enhance the beneficial effects of IABP on left ventricular function for patients in cardiogenic shock.

Citing Articles

Ventilation strategies in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the AltShock-2 registry.

Sacco A, Montisci A, Tavecchia G, Frea S, Bernasconi D, Colombo C Eur J Heart Fail. 2024; 26(11):2412-2420.

PMID: 39105476 PMC: 11659490. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3409.


Percutaneous coronary intervention assisted by invasive mechanical ventilation and intra-aortic balloon pump for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: Retrospective cohort study and meta-analyses.

Liu Y, Li C, Lu P, Wang X, Xiao J, Gao M Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2019; 20(4):514-523.

PMID: 31782697 PMC: 7664793. DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4500.

References
1.
Dongelmans D, Hemmes S, Kudoga A, Veelo D, Binnekade J, Schultz M . Positive end-expiratory pressure following coronary artery bypass grafting. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012; 78(7):790-800. View

2.
Hochman J, Sleeper L, WEBB J, Sanborn T, White H, Talley J . Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(9):625-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901. View

3.
Masip J . Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008; 14(5):531-5. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830c4862. View

4.
Thiele H, Schuler G, Neumann F, Hausleiter J, Olbrich H, Schwarz B . Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial. Am Heart J. 2012; 163(6):938-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.012. View

5.
Goldberg R, Spencer F, Gore J, Lessard D, Yarzebski J . Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation. 2009; 119(9):1211-9. PMC: 2730832. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947. View