Problematic Internet Users Show Impaired Inhibitory Control and Risk Taking with Losses: Evidence from Stop Signal and Mixed Gambles Tasks

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2016 Mar 26

PMID 27014170

Citations 7

Authors

Qi Li

Weizhi Nan

Jamie Taxer

Weine Dai

Ya Zheng

Xun Liu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

According to the balance model of self-regulation, dysfunction of the inhibitory control and reward processing might be a behavioral marker for addiction and problematic behaviors. Although several studies have separately examined the inhibitory control or reward processing of individuals exhibiting problematic Internet use (PIU), no study has explored these two functions simultaneously to examine the potential imbalance of these functions. This study aimed to investigate whether the self-regulatory failure of PIU individuals results from deficits in both inhibitory control [indexed with the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) in a stop signal task] and risk taking with losses (measured as the acceptance rates of risky gables or the ratio of win/loss in a mixed gambles task). The results revealed that PIU individuals, compared with controls, showed decreased SSRT and increased error rates as well as reduced risk taking with losses. Correlational analyses revealed a significant positive relationship between the SSRT and risk taking with losses. These findings suggest that both the inhibitory control and reward functions are impaired in PIU individuals and reveal an association between these two systems. These results strengthen the balance model of self-regulation theory's argument that deficits in inhibitory control and risk taking with losses may assist in identifying risk markers for early diagnosis, progression, and prediction of PIU.

Citing Articles

Dissociation of prepotent response inhibition and interference control in problematic internet use: evidence from the Go/No-Go and Flanker tasks.

Zhang S, Zhong Y, Li X, Peng M BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):216.

PMID: 38637843 PMC: 11027223. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01698-6.

Ideal Time of Day for Risky Decision Making: Evidence from the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.

Li M, Mai Z, Yang J, Zhang B, Ma N Nat Sci Sleep. 2020; 12:477-486.

PMID: 32765144 PMC: 7381795. DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S260321.

Impulsive decision-making predicts the course of substance-related and addictive disorders.

Kraplin A, Hofler M, Pooseh S, Wolff M, Kronke K, Goschke T Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020; 237(9):2709-2724.

PMID: 32500211 PMC: 7501099. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-020-05567-z.

Inhibitory Control in Excessive Social Networking Users: Evidence From an Event-Related Potential-Based Go-Nogo Task.

Gao Q, Jia G, Zhao J, Zhang D Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1810.

PMID: 31447743 PMC: 6692436. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01810.

Problematic internet use: an exploration of associations between cognition and COMT rs4818, rs4680 haplotypes.

Ioannidis K, Redden S, Valle S, Chamberlain S, Grant J CNS Spectr. 2019; 25(3):409-418.

PMID: 31159911 PMC: 7292732. DOI: 10.1017/S1092852919001019.

References

Leeman R, Hoff R, Krishnan-Sarin S, Patock-Peckham J, Potenza M . Impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and part-time job status in relation to substance use and gambling in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 54(4):460-6. PMC: 4048016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.014. View

Goudriaan A, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W . Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005; 23(1):137-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.017. View

Yechiam E, Hochman G . Losses as modulators of attention: review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains. Psychol Bull. 2012; 139(2):497-518. DOI: 10.1037/a0029383. View

Zhou Z, Zhu H, Li C, Wang J . Internet addictive individuals share impulsivity and executive dysfunction with alcohol-dependent patients. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 8:288. PMC: 4142341. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00288. View

Tsitsika A, Critselis E, Janikian M, Kormas G, Kafetzis D . Association between internet gambling and problematic internet use among adolescents. J Gambl Stud. 2010; 27(3):389-400. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-010-9223-z. View

Billieux J, Gay P, Rochat L, Khazaal Y, Zullino D, Van der Linden M . Lack of inhibitory control predicts cigarette smoking dependence: evidence from a non-deprived sample of light to moderate smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 112(1-2):164-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.06.006. View

Gullo M, Loxton N, Dawe S . Impulsivity: four ways five factors are not basic to addiction. Addict Behav. 2014; 39(11):1547-1556. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.002. View

van Holst R, van Holstein M, van den Brink W, Veltman D, Goudriaan A . Response inhibition during cue reactivity in problem gamblers: an fMRI study. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e30909. PMC: 3316530. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030909. View

Tremeau F, Brady M, Saccente E, Moreno A, Epstein H, Citrome L . Loss aversion in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008; 103(1-3):121-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.03.027. View

10.

Goudriaan A, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W . Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction. 2006; 101(4):534-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01380.x. View

11.

Dong G, DeVito E, Du X, Cui Z . Impaired inhibitory control in 'internet addiction disorder': a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Res. 2012; 203(2-3):153-8. PMC: 3650485. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.02.001. View

12.

Heatherton T, Wagner D . Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 15(3):132-9. PMC: 3062191. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005. View

13.

Odlaug B, Chamberlain S, Kim S, Schreiber L, Grant J . A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity. Psychol Med. 2011; 41(10):2111-9. PMC: 3381334. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291711000316. View

14.

Svaldi J, Naumann E, Trentowska M, Schmitz F . General and food-specific inhibitory deficits in binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord. 2014; 47(5):534-42. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22260. View

15.

Zhou Z, Yuan G, Yao J, Li C, Cheng Z . An event-related potential investigation of deficient inhibitory control in individuals with pathological Internet use. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2016; 22(5):228-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5215.2010.00444.x. View

16.

Dong G, Zhou H, Zhao X . Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neurosci Lett. 2010; 485(2):138-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.002. View

17.

Liu G, Yen J, Chen C, Yen C, Chen C, Lin W . Brain activation for response inhibition under gaming cue distraction in internet gaming disorder. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014; 30(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.08.005. View

18.

Choi J, Park S, Roh M, Lee J, Park C, Hwang J . Dysfunctional inhibitory control and impulsivity in Internet addiction. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 215(2):424-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.001. View

19.

Beck A, Schlagenhauf F, Wustenberg T, Hein J, Kienast T, Kahnt T . Ventral striatal activation during reward anticipation correlates with impulsivity in alcoholics. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 66(8):734-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.035. View

20.

Higgins E . Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol. 1998; 52(12):1280-300. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.12.1280. View