» Articles » PMID: 27014163

How Can We Study the Evolution of Animal Minds?

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2016 Mar 26
PMID 27014163
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the last 50 years, comparative cognition and neurosciences have improved our understanding of animal minds while evolutionary ecology has revealed how selection acts on traits through evolutionary time. We describe how cognition can be subject to natural selection like any other biological trait and how this evolutionary approach can be used to understand the evolution of animal cognition. We recount how comparative and fitness methods have been used to understand the evolution of cognition and outline how these approaches could extend our understanding of cognition. The fitness approach, in particular, offers unprecedented opportunities to study the evolutionary mechanisms responsible for variation in cognition within species and could allow us to investigate both proximate (i.e., neural and developmental) and ultimate (i.e., ecological and evolutionary) underpinnings of animal cognition together. We highlight recent studies that have successfully shown that cognitive traits can be under selection, in particular by linking individual variation in cognition to fitness. To bridge the gap between cognitive variation and fitness consequences and to better understand why and how selection can occur on cognition, we end this review by proposing a more integrative approach to study contemporary selection on cognitive traits combining socio-ecological data, minimally invasive neuroscience methods and measurement of ecologically relevant behaviors linked to fitness. Our overall goal in this review is to build a bridge between cognitive neuroscientists and evolutionary biologists, illustrate how their research could be complementary, and encourage evolutionary ecologists to include explicit attention to cognitive processes in their studies of behavior.

Citing Articles

Environmental harshness does not affect the propensity for social learning in great tits, Parus major.

Isaksson E, Morand-Ferron J, Chaine A Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):25.

PMID: 38467946 PMC: 10927812. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01862-w.


Cognitive performance is linked to fitness in a wild primate.

Fichtel C, Henke-von der Malsburg J, Kappeler P Sci Adv. 2023; 9(28):eadf9365.

PMID: 37436999 PMC: 10337904. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf9365.


The role of cognition in nesting.

Lehtonen T, Helantera H, Solvi C, Wong B, Loukola O Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1884):20220142.

PMID: 37427464 PMC: 10331919. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0142.


Cognitive performance is linked to survival in free-living African striped mice.

Rochais C, Schradin C, Pillay N Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(1994):20230205.

PMID: 36883277 PMC: 9993040. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0205.


Horses' Tactile Reactivity Differs According to the Type of Work: The Example of Equine-Assisted Intervention.

Rochais C, Lerch N, Gueguen L, Schmidlin M, Bonamy O, Grandgeorge M Vet Sci. 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36851434 PMC: 9959874. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10020130.


References
1.
Rowe . Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim Behav. 1999; 58(5):921-931. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1242. View

2.
Healy I , Braithwaite I . Cognitive ecology: a field of substance?. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999; 15(1):22-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01737-1. View

3.
Allman J, Hasenstaub A . Brains, maturation times, and parenting. Neurobiol Aging. 1999; 20(4):447-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0197-4580(99)00076-7. View

4.
Templeton J, Kamil A, Balda R . Sociality and social learning in two species of corvids: the pinyon jay (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) and the Clark's nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana). J Comp Psychol. 1999; 113(4):450-5. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.450. View

5.
Grossberg . The complementary brain: unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(6):233-246. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01464-9. View