» Articles » PMID: 27012503

Single Subject Prediction of Brain Disorders in Neuroimaging: Promises and Pitfalls

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Mar 26
PMID 27012503
Citations 344
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuroimaging-based single subject prediction of brain disorders has gained increasing attention in recent years. Using a variety of neuroimaging modalities such as structural, functional and diffusion MRI, along with machine learning techniques, hundreds of studies have been carried out for accurate classification of patients with heterogeneous mental and neurodegenerative disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. More than 500 studies have been published during the past quarter century on single subject prediction focused on a multiple brain disorders. In the first part of this study, we provide a survey of more than 200 reports in this field with a focus on schizophrenia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), depressive disorders, autism spectrum disease (ASD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Detailed information about those studies such as sample size, type and number of extracted features and reported accuracy are summarized and discussed. To our knowledge, this is by far the most comprehensive review of neuroimaging-based single subject prediction of brain disorders. In the second part, we present our opinion on major pitfalls of those studies from a machine learning point of view. Common biases are discussed and suggestions are provided. Moreover, emerging trends such as decentralized data sharing, multimodal brain imaging, differential diagnosis, disease subtype classification and deep learning are also discussed. Based on this survey, there is extensive evidence showing the great potential of neuroimaging data for single subject prediction of various disorders. However, the main bottleneck of this exciting field is still the limited sample size, which could be potentially addressed by modern data sharing models such as the ones discussed in this paper. Emerging big data technologies and advanced data-intensive machine learning methodologies such as deep learning have coincided with an increasing need for accurate, robust and generalizable single subject prediction of brain disorders during an exciting time. In this report, we survey the past and offer some opinions regarding the road ahead.

Citing Articles

Structural Cerebellar and Lateral Frontoparietal Networks are altered in CUD: An SBM Analysis.

Lacomba-Arnau E, Martinez-Molina A, Barros-Loscertales A Addict Biol. 2025; 30(3):e70021.

PMID: 40072344 PMC: 11899759. DOI: 10.1111/adb.70021.


Cognitive performance classification of older patients using machine learning and electronic medical records.

Richter-Laskowska M, Sobotnicka E, Bednorz A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6564.

PMID: 39994339 PMC: 11850844. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90460-y.


A lightweight generative model for interpretable subject-level prediction.

Mauri C, Cerri S, Puonti O, Muhlau M, Van Leemput K Med Image Anal. 2025; 101:103436.

PMID: 39793217 PMC: 11876000. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103436.


Artificial Intelligence-Based Methodologies for Early Diagnostic Precision and Personalized Therapeutic Strategies in Neuro-Ophthalmic and Neurodegenerative Pathologies.

Kumar R, Waisberg E, Ong J, Paladugu P, Amiri D, Saintyl J Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766465 PMC: 11674895. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121266.


Differential gray matter correlates and machine learning prediction of abuse and internalizing psychopathology in adolescent females.

Heyn S, Keding T, Cisler J, McLaughlin K, Herringa R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):651.

PMID: 39753729 PMC: 11698963. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84616-5.


References
1.
Calhoun V, Adali T, Kiehl K, Astur R, Pekar J, Pearlson G . A method for multitask fMRI data fusion applied to schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005; 27(7):598-610. PMC: 2751648. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20204. View

2.
Castro E, Gomez-Verdejo V, Martinez-Ramon M, Kiehl K, Calhoun V . A multiple kernel learning approach to perform classification of groups from complex-valued fMRI data analysis: application to schizophrenia. Neuroimage. 2013; 87:1-17. PMC: 3946896. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.065. View

3.
Janousova E, Schwarz D, Kasparek T . Combining various types of classifiers and features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging data in schizophrenia recognition. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 232(3):237-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.03.004. View

4.
Pereira F, Mitchell T, Botvinick M . Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview. Neuroimage. 2008; 45(1 Suppl):S199-209. PMC: 2892746. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.007. View

5.
Zhang T, Davatzikos C . ODVBA: optimally-discriminative voxel-based analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011; 30(8):1441-54. PMC: 3402713. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2114362. View