» Articles » PMID: 27012249

The Full Translational Spectrum of Prevention Science: Facilitating the Transfer of Knowledge to Practices and Policies That Prevent Behavioral Health Problems

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 26
PMID 27012249
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A broad-span, six-stage translational prevention model is presented, extending from the basic sciences-taking a multi-level systems approach, including the neurobiological sciences-through to globalization. The application of a very wide perspective of translation research from basic scientific discovery to international policy change promises to elicit sustainable, population-level reductions in behavioral health disorders. To illustrate the conceptualization and actualization of a program of translational prevention research, we walk through each stage of research to practice and policy using an exemplar, callous-unemotional (CU) traits. Basic science has identified neurobiological, psychophysiological, behavioral, contextual, and experiential differences in this subgroup, and yet, these findings have not been applied to the development of more targeted intervention. As a result, there are currently no programs considered especially effective for CU traits, likely because they do not specifically target underlying mechanisms. To prevent/reduce the prevalence of conduct disorder, it is critical that we transfer existing knowledge to subsequent translational stages, including intervention development, implementation, and scaling. And eventually, once resulting programs have been rigorously evaluated, replicated, and adapted across cultural, ethnic, and gender groups, there is potential to institutionalize them as well as call attention to the special needs of this population. In this paper, we begin to consider what resources and changes in research perspectives are needed to move along this translational spectrum.

Citing Articles

Addressing the "Last Mile" Problem in Educational Research: Educational Researchers' Interest, Knowledge, and Use of Implementation Science Constructs.

Gaias L, Cook C, Brewer S, Bruns E, Lyon A Educ Res Eval. 2025; 28(7-8):205-233.

PMID: 39845578 PMC: 11753797. DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2023.2285440.


Practical, Economic, and Policy Implications of the Leve et al. Paper.

Fishbein D, Roman J Prev Sci. 2024; 25(8):1200-1206.

PMID: 39565440 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-024-01756-w.


The Promise and Challenges of Integrating Biological and Prevention Sciences: A Community-Engaged Model for the Next Generation of Translational Research.

Leve L, Kanamori M, Humphreys K, Jaffee S, Nusslock R, Oro V Prev Sci. 2024; 25(8):1177-1199.

PMID: 39225944 PMC: 11652675. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-024-01720-8.


Evidence-informed stakeholder consultations to promote rights-based approaches for children with disabilities.

Shikako K, Lai J, Yoo P, Teachman G, Majnemer A Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1322191.

PMID: 38742042 PMC: 11089101. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1322191.


Neuroscience-informed classification of prevention interventions in substance use disorders: An RDoC-based approach.

Rezapour T, Rafei P, Baldacchino A, Conrod P, Dom G, Fishbein D Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024; 159:105578.

PMID: 38360332 PMC: 11081014. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105578.


References
1.
Venkatakrishnan A, Sandrini M . Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 107(1):1-4. PMC: 3349687. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00557.2011. View

2.
Murrie D, Cornell D . The Millon adolescent clinical inventory and psychopathy. J Pers Assess. 2000; 75(1):110-25. DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7501_8. View

3.
Sanders M, Kirby J, Tellegen C, Day J . The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014; 34(4):337-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.003. View

4.
Fisher L, Blair R . Cognitive impairment and its relationship to psychopathic tendencies in children with emotional and behavioral difficulties. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999; 26(6):511-9. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022655919743. View

5.
Sussman S, Levy D, Hassmiller Lich K, Cene C, Kim M, Rohrbach L . Comparing effects of tobacco use prevention modalities: need for complex system models. Tob Induc Dis. 2013; 11(1):2. PMC: 3567972. DOI: 10.1186/1617-9625-11-2. View