Shear Bond Strength of Bulk-fill and Nano-restorative Materials to Dentin

Overview

Journal Eur J Dent

Publisher Thieme

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2016 Mar 25

PMID 27011738

Citations 8

Authors

Hakan Colak

Ertugrul Ercan

Mehmet Mustafa Hamidi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Bulk-fill composite materials are being developed for preparation depths of up to 4 mm in an effort to simplify and improve the placement of direct composite posterior restorations. The aim of our study was to compare shear-bond strength of bulk-fill and conventional posterior composite resins.

Materials And Methods: In this study, 60 caries free extracted human molars were used and sectioned parallel to occlusal surface to expose midcoronal dentin. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups. Total-etch dentine bonding system (Adper Scotchbond 1XT, 3M ESPE) was applied to dentin surface in all the groups to reduce variability in results. Then, dentine surfaces covered by following materials. Group I: SonicFill Bulk-Fill, Group II: Tetric EvoCeram (TBF), Group III: Herculite XRV Ultra, and Group IV: TBF Bulk-Fill, 2 mm × 3 mm cylindrical restorations were prepared by using application apparatus. Shear bond testing was measured by using a universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed to evaluate the data.

Results: The highest value was observed in Group III (14.42 ± 4.34) and the lowest value was observed in Group IV (11.16 ± 2.76) and there is a statistically significant difference between these groups (P = 0.046). However, there is no statistically significant difference between the values of other groups. In this study, Group III was showed higher strength values.

Conclusion: There is a need for future studies about long-term bond strength and clinical success of these adhesive and bulk-fill systems.

Citing Articles

Impact of refrigeration of different Resin composite restorative materials on the marginal adaptation in class II restorations.

El-Maksoud O, Hamama H, Wafaie R, El-Wassefy N, Mahmoud S BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1174.

PMID: 39363215 PMC: 11451262. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04886-3.

Comparing the Ability of Various Resin-Based Composites and Techniques to Seal Margins in Class-II Cavities.

Aljamhan A, Alhazzaa S, Albakr A, Habib S, Zafar M Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(17).

PMID: 34502961 PMC: 8434433. DOI: 10.3390/polym13172921.

Microleakage of Direct Restorations-Comparisonbetween Bulk-Fill and Traditional Composite Resins:Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zotti F, Falavigna E, Capocasale G, De Santis D, Albanese M Eur J Dent. 2021; 15(4):755-767.

PMID: 34450679 PMC: 8630972. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724155.

Fracture resistance of pulpotomized and composite-restored primary molars: Incremental versus bulk-fill techniques.

Ghajari M, Ghasemi A, Moradi A, Sanjari K Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021; 17(6):412-416.

PMID: 33889345 PMC: 8045525.

Effect of Different Application Techniques of Universal Bonding System on Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites to Primary and Permanent Dentin.

Ghajari M, Sheikholeslamian M, Ghasemi A, Simaei L Front Dent. 2021; 17(2):1-8.

PMID: 33615296 PMC: 7882192. DOI: 10.18502/fid.v17i1.3962.

References

Unlu N, Gunal S, Ulker M, Ozer F, Blatz M . Influence of operator experience on in vitro bond strength of dentin adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2011; 14(3):223-7. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a22191. View

Ilie N, Kessler A, Durner J . Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites. J Dent. 2013; 41(8):695-702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.008. View

Ferracane J, MITCHEM J, Condon J, Todd R . Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res. 1997; 76(8):1508-16. DOI: 10.1177/00220345970760081401. View

Czasch P, Ilie N . In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 17(1):227-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8. View

Ilie N, Hickel R . Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater. 2011; 27(4):348-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014. View

El-Damanhoury H, Platt J . Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2013; 39(4):374-82. DOI: 10.2341/13-017-L. View

Moraes R, Garcia J, Barros M, Lewis S, Pfeifer C, Liu J . Control of polymerization shrinkage and stress in nanogel-modified monomer and composite materials. Dent Mater. 2011; 27(6):509-19. PMC: 3087207. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.006. View

Dursun E, Le Goff S, Ruse D, Attal J . Effect of chlorhexidine application on the long-term shear bond strength to dentin of a resin-modified glass ionomer. Oper Dent. 2012; 38(3):275-81. DOI: 10.2341/11-501-L. View

Benetti A, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honore D, Pedersen M, Pallesen U . Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent. 2014; 40(2):190-200. DOI: 10.2341/13-324-L. View

10.

Ruyter I, Oysaed H . Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 1982; 40(3):179-92. DOI: 10.3109/00016358209012726. View

11.

Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Husler J, Lussi A . Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials?. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(5):521-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.002. View

12.

Shortall A, Palin W, Burtscher P . Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res. 2007; 87(1):84-8. DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700115. View

13.

Pianelli C, Devaux J, Bebelman S, Leloup G . The micro-Raman spectroscopy, a useful tool to determine the degree of conversion of light-activated composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 48(5):675-81. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(1999)48:5<675::aid-jbm11>3.0.co;2-p. View

14.

Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E . Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent. 2004; 32(2):109-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.008. View

15.

Caughman W, Caughman G, Shiflett R, Rueggeberg F, Schuster G . Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomaterials. 1991; 12(8):737-40. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90022-3. View

16.

Fujita K, Nishiyama N, Nemoto K, Okada T, Ikemi T . Effect of base monomer's refractive index on curing depth and polymerization conversion of photo-cured resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2005; 24(3):403-8. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.24.403. View

17.

Lassila L, Nagas E, Vallittu P, Garoushi S . Translucency of flowable bulk-filling composites of various thicknesses. Chin J Dent Res. 2012; 15(1):31-5. View

18.

Leprince J, Palin W, Hadis M, Devaux J, Leloup G . Progress in dimethacrylate-based dental composite technology and curing efficiency. Dent Mater. 2012; 29(2):139-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.11.005. View

19.

Ilie N, Hickel R . Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2009; 13(4):427-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0258-4. View

20.

Agarwal R, Hiremath H, Agarwal J, Garg A . Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(1):56-61. PMC: 4313481. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.148897. View