» Articles » PMID: 27011160

High Intrathoracic Anastomosis with Thoracoscopy Is Safe and Feasible for Treatment of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Mar 25
PMID 27011160
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has the potential to reduce the morbidity and mortality of esophageal cancer surgery. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has a high incidence of earlier lymphatic spread and is usually located more proximal to the incisor than esophageal adenocarcinoma; consequently, the anastomosis should be made more proximal in the thorax or in the neck. We adopted the proximal intrathoracic anastomotic technique using thoracoscopy for mid-to-lower ESCC.

Methods: From October 2010 to August 2014, fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent MIE for ESCC. After laparoscopic gastric tubing, thoracoscopic esophageal resection and reconstruction were performed using a 28-mm circular stapler following radical mediastinal lymph node dissection. We tried to make an anastomosis at the apex of the chest. Postoperative outcomes, including overall survival and recurrence, were assessed.

Results: The mean patient age was 64.3±9 years. The mean operative time was 371.8±51.6 minutes, and the duration of the thorax procedure was 254.8±38.3 minutes. The mean number of lymph nodes dissected was 31±11.7. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay were 3.5±8.2 hours and 13.6±7.4 days, respectively. The level of anastomosis was 22.3±1.8cm from the incisor. One patient died of uncontrolled sepsis due to necrosis of the gastric graft. Two patients developed small contained leakage. Nine patients exhibited distant metastasis during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: Thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis at the proximal esophagus is feasible and safe.

Citing Articles

Safe and convenient intrathoracic anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Kim S J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023; 26(2):53-54.

PMID: 37347103 PMC: 10280106. DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.53.


Intrathoracic anastomosis using handsewn purse-string suturing by the double-ligation method in laparo-thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Takahashi T, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A, Takayama Y, Aoyama H, Hosoi T J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023; 26(2):64-71.

PMID: 37347097 PMC: 10280111. DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.64.


Successful Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Extensive Gastric Tubing Necrosis after Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy: A Case Report.

Kim H, Jeon H J Chest Surg. 2023; 56(5):362-366.

PMID: 36918520 PMC: 10480393. DOI: 10.5090/jcs.22.152.


Case report: Drainage tube penetrating anastomosis as a rare cause for long-term nonunion of esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.

Huang Y, Fu X, Fu S Front Surg. 2023; 10:1140839.

PMID: 36911617 PMC: 9992177. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1140839.


A new technology for reducing anastomotic fistula in the neck after esophageal cancer surgery.

Song Y, Qi Y, Zhang C, Sheng Y, Wu K, Zhu S J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11(7):3084-3092.

PMID: 31463137 PMC: 6688031. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.28.


References
1.
Rindani R, Martin C, Cox M . Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999; 69(3):187-94. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01520.x. View

2.
Luketich J, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura P, Christie N, McCaughan J, Litle V . Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003; 238(4):486-94. PMC: 1360107. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000089858.40725.68. View

3.
Lee J, Sung S, Park J, Park C, Song K . Laparoscopic gastric tube formation with pyloromyotomy for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 89(3):117-23. PMC: 4559613. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2015.89.3.117. View

4.
Tapias L, Morse C . A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2011; 25(5):449-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01269.x. View

5.
Palazzo F, Rosato E, Chaudhary A, Evans 3rd N, Sendecki J, Keith S . Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220(4):672-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.023. View