» Articles » PMID: 27009082

Endoscopic Resection of Subtotal or Completely Circumferential Laterally Spreading Colonic Adenomas: Technique, Caveats, and Outcomes

Overview
Journal Endoscopy
Date 2016 Mar 25
PMID 27009082
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Study Aims: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an established treatment for large (≥ 20 mm) laterally spreading lesions (LSLs). LSLs with complete or subtotal (> 90 %) circumferential extent (C-LSLs) are generally referred for surgery. Data on technique, efficacy, and safety of EMR for these lesions are absent. The aim of this study was to describe the technique and long-term outcomes of EMR for C-LSLs.

Patients And Methods: Prospective observational study of consecutive patients referred for EMR of LSL at a tertiary care center over 63 months to April 2015. Amongst 979 patients with LSL, 12 patients with C-LSL were seen.

Results: All lesions were tubulovillous adenomas with granular 0 - IIa + Is morphology. Median longitudinal extent was 95 mm (range 60 - 160), 58 % were located in the rectum, and 3 lesions (25 %) had complete circumferential involvement. EMR technical success was 100 %. There were no major adverse events. Symptomatic stricturing occurred in 2 cases (17 %) and was treated with endoscopic balloon dilation (median 4 sessions). Median follow up is 13 months. Minor residual adenoma was found in 7 (58 %) at first surveillance colonoscopy and was treated with snare excision. A total of 10 patients have completed a second surveillance colonoscopy with minor residual adenoma found in only 1 case. No patient required surgery or developed cancer in long-term follow-up.

Conclusions: Endoscopic resection of C-LSL is feasible and safe. Minor residual adenoma is common but endoscopically treatable with long-term cure. Symptomatic stricturing amenable to balloon dilation may occur. Empiric surgical referral for C-LSL based on extensive circumferential involvement may be avoided.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01368289.

Citing Articles

Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyp management through the lens of an interventional endoscopist.

Jiang S, Shahidi N Can J Surg. 2024; 67(5):E345-E348.

PMID: 39442949 PMC: 11530263. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010623.


Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyp management: The elephant in the room.

Jiang S, Shahidi N World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(25):3126-3131.

PMID: 39006383 PMC: 11238671. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i25.3126.


Comparative study of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy versus perineal stapler resection for external full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients: enhanced outcomes and reduced recurrence rates-a retrospective cohort study.

Habeeb T, Podda M, Chiaretti M, Kechagias A, Lledo J, Kalmoush A Tech Coloproctol. 2024; 28(1):48.

PMID: 38619626 PMC: 11018677. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02919-1.


Optical evaluation: the crux for effective management of colorectal neoplasia.

Shahidi N, Vosko S, van Hattem W, Sidhu M, Bourke M Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020; 13:1756284820922746.

PMID: 32523625 PMC: 7235649. DOI: 10.1177/1756284820922746.


Endoscopic management of large ileocecal valve lesions over an 18-year interval.

Ponugoti P, Broadley H, Garcia J, Rex D Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7(12):E1646-E1651.

PMID: 31788547 PMC: 6877426. DOI: 10.1055/a-0990-9035.