Comparison of 2, 5, and 20 % O2 on the Development of Post-thaw Human Embryos
Overview
Reproductive Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of 2, 5, and 20 % O2 on post-thaw day 3 human embryo culture until blastocyst stage.
Methods: One hundred fifty-five day 3 human embryos were used. One hundred twenty out of 155 embryos were recovered after thawing. Surviving embryos were distributed into 2, 5, or 20 % O2 groups and cultured for 2.5 days. At the end of culture, blastocyst formation was assessed, and then, embryos were collected for RT-qPCR or immunofluorescence analysis.
Results: Using visible blastocoel to define blastocyst formation, 58.7 % (27/46) of surviving day 3 embryos formed blastocyst at 2 % O2, 63.6 % (28/44) at 5 % O2, and 66.7 % (20/30) at 20 % O2. The difference in blastocyst formation rates was not significant. Average blastocyst cell number was 119.44 ± 11.64 at 2 % O2, 142.55 ± 22.47 at 5 % O2, and 97.29 ± 14.87 at 20 % O2. Average apoptotic rate was 4.7 % ± 0.4 % for blastocyst formed at 2 % O2, 3.5 % ± 0.7 % at 5 % O2, and 5.8 % ± 1.1 % at 20 % O2. Apoptosis rate was significantly lower for blastocysts formed at 5 % O2 (p < 0.05). Compared with gene expression levels at 5 % O2, which were arbitrarily set as "1," 20 % O2 is associated with significantly higher expression of BAX (2.14 ± 0.47), G6PD (2.92 ± 1.06), MnSOD (2.87 ± 0.88), and HSP70.1 (8.68 ± 4.19). For all genes tested, no significant differences were found between 2 and 5 % O2.
Conclusion: The result suggests that development of cryopreserved human embryos from day 3 to blastocyst stage benefits from culture at 5 % O2.
Pranomphon T, Lopez-Valinas A, Alminana C, Mahe C, Lopes Brair V, Parnpai R Biol Res. 2024; 57(1):73.
PMID: 39438935 PMC: 11494963. DOI: 10.1186/s40659-024-00555-5.
Culture of Human Embryos at High and Low Oxygen Levels.
Konstantogianni O, Panou T, Zikopoulos A, Skentou C, Stavros S, Asimakopoulos B J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).
PMID: 38673495 PMC: 11050882. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082222.
Patel D, Patel R, Patel T, Patel N, Maheshwari N J Hum Reprod Sci. 2024; 16(4):324-332.
PMID: 38322644 PMC: 10841928. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_143_23.
Bartolacci A, Tondo F, Alteri A, Solano Narduche L, de Girolamo S, DAlessandro G Life (Basel). 2023; 13(11).
PMID: 38004301 PMC: 10671934. DOI: 10.3390/life13112161.
Chen H, Lee C, Huang C, Cheng E, Lee T, Lin P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4330.
PMID: 36922540 PMC: 10017668. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31472-4.