» Articles » PMID: 27006014

Effect of Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve-block on Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomised, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Anesthesiol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2016 Mar 24
PMID 27006014
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure associated with moderate postoperative pain. No nerve block without loss of motor function has been documented for THA. We hypothesised that an ultrasound-guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block added to a multimodal postoperative pain regimen would reduce postoperative pain after THA.

Methods: One hundred patients who had a THA by the posterior approach were evaluated in this randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded, parallel-group trial comparing an ultrasound-guided LFCN-block with either 8 ml of ropivacaine, 7.5 mg/ml, (Group Ropivacaine) or 8 ml of saline (Group Placebo) given postoperatively. Surgery was performed under spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was pain (measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) 4 h post-blockade during 30° flexion of the hip. Secondary outcomes were pain at rest, pain during movement, oxycodone consumption (0-24 h), time to mobilisation, ability to mobilise, and length of stay. Patients, assessors and all staff involved with patient care were blinded to the intervention.

Results: There was no difference in primary outcome between Group Ropivacaine and Group Placebo (VAS 27 mm vs. 31 mm, p = 0.41; difference -5 mm (95% CI: -15 mm - +5 mm). No differences in any of the secondary outcomes were observed. No adverse events, or harms, were observed during the trial.

Conclusion: Pain scores, opioid use, time to mobilisation, and length of stay were low in both Group Ropivacaine and Group Placebo. We found no added analgesic effect of a LFCN-block when combined with paracetamol and ibuprofen after THA by the posterior approach.

Trial Registration: EudraCT: 2013-004501-12 (December 16th 2013).

Citing Articles

Is pericapsular nerve group block superior to other regional analgesia techniques following total hip arthroplasty? a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Wan L, Huang H, Zhang F, Li Y, Zhou Y Perioper Med (Lond). 2024; 13(1):96.

PMID: 39367478 PMC: 11451061. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00455-y.


Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach: A Single-blinded Randomized Control Trial.

Sakuraba S, Omae T, Nojiri S, Koh K, Yamazaki S, Kumemura M Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2024; 69(2):116-123.

PMID: 38854452 PMC: 11153057. DOI: 10.14789/jmj.JMJ22-0033-OA.


Ultrasound-guided anterior iliopsoas muscle space block effectively reduces intraoperative hypotension in elderly adults undergoing hip surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Teng Q, Wang C, Dong J, Yan H, Chen M, Xu T Front Mol Neurosci. 2023; 16:1119667.

PMID: 36756613 PMC: 9900129. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1119667.


Usefulness of ultrasonography guided femoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks in providing analgesia before giving spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for intertrochanteric fracture of femur: A randomized clinical trial.

Meti V, Lohit K, Amarappa G, Babu R, Balaraju T, Lavanya S J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 38(3):469-473.

PMID: 36505223 PMC: 9728448. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_525_20.


Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Iliohypogastric/Ilioinguinal Nerve Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Wang Q, Yang Y, Yang Z, Hu Y, Zhao X, Chen C Orthop Surg. 2021; 13(3):920-931.

PMID: 33788407 PMC: 8126898. DOI: 10.1111/os.12795.


References
1.
Corujo A, Franco C, Williams J . The sensory territory of the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh as determined by anatomic dissections and ultrasound-guided blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012; 37(5):561-4. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318261c8b6. View

2.
Ilchmann T, Gersbach S, Zwicky L, Clauss M . Standard Transgluteal versus Minimal Invasive Anterior Approach in hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Consecutive Cohort Study. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014; 5(4):e31. PMC: 3883072. DOI: 10.4081/or.2013.e31. View

3.
Andersen L, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen B, Husted H, Otte K, Kehlet H . Subacute pain and function after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64(5):508-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05831.x. View

4.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink P, Allen S, Rosseland L, Romundstad L, Hals E . Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen103. View

5.
Andersen L, Kehlet H . Analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 113(3):360-74. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu155. View