Determinants of Patient Satisfaction: a Systematic Review
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aim: A large number of studies have addressed the detection of patient satisfaction determinants, and the results are still inconclusive. Furthermore, it is known that contradicting evidence exists across patient satisfaction studies. This article is the second part of a two-part series of research with a goal to review a current conceptual framework of patient satisfaction for further operationalisation procedures. The aim of this work was to systematically identify and review evidence regarding determinants of patient satisfaction between 1980 and 2014, and to seek the reasons for contradicting results in relationships between determinants and patient satisfaction in the literature to design a further robust measurement system for patient satisfaction.
Method: This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus in October 2014. Studies published in full in peer reviewed journals between January 1980 and August 2014 and in the English language were included. We included 109 articles for the synthesis.
Results: We found several number of determinants of patient satisfaction investigated in a wide diversity of studies. However, study results were varied due to no globally accepted formulation of patient satisfaction and measurement system.
Conclusions: Health care service quality indicators were the most influential determinants of patient satisfaction across the studies. Among them, health providers' interpersonal care quality was the essential determinant of patient satisfaction. Sociodemographic characteristics were the most varied in the review. The strength and directions of associations with patient satisfaction were found inconsistent. Therefore, person-related characteristics should be considered to be the potential determinants and confounders simultaneously. The selected studies were not able to show all potential characteristics which may have had effects on satisfaction. There is a need for more studies on how cultural, behavioural, and socio-demographic differences affect patient satisfaction, using a standardised questionnaire.
Validating Patient Perspectives: A Study on the Reliability of Satisfaction Survey Tools.
Charrier L, Ricotti A, Marnetto F, Comoretto R, Berchialla P, Carratello E Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 19:463-472.
PMID: 40046562 PMC: 11881768. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S490871.
Patient Satisfaction with Primary Health Care Services in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Albaqami N, Alshagrawi S Int J Gen Med. 2025; 18:835-845.
PMID: 39990300 PMC: 11844311. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S506595.
Factors Impacting Patient Satisfaction at a Single Academic Sports Medicine Institution.
Cushman D, Wirawan C, Kazmers N, Teramoto M Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77732.
PMID: 39974210 PMC: 11839235. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77732.
Vaisanen V, Satokangas M, Huhtakangas M, Antikainen H, Sinervo T BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):281.
PMID: 39972338 PMC: 11841193. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12409-1.
Hareru H, Ashuro Z, Debela B, Sisay D, Ashenafi E, Abebe M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e085169.
PMID: 39971610 PMC: 11840913. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085169.