» Articles » PMID: 26998353

Visual Recovery After Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2016 Mar 22
PMID 26998353
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate possible speeding up recovery time after retinal detachment (RD) surgery using biofeedback strategy. Methods. A total of 52 eyes were selected. After surgery, patients were divided into two groups: group A, including patients submitted to biofeedback with MP-1 strategy; group B, patients who received common care strategy. Biofeedback strategy was started 15 days after the suspension of cycloplegic eye drops in buckling procedure or after silicone oil removal in the vitrectomized eyes. Controls were scheduled at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 weeks. Results. At baseline, there was no significant difference in BCVA between groups (P = 0.4230). At the end of biofeedback treatment (WK 6) BCVA of group A was significantly better (P < 0.001) than group B and BCVA was still better in group A than group B at WK 12 (P = 0.028) and at WK 18 (P = 0.041). Conclusions. Visual recovery after RD surgery is still unclear, and it does not depend on entity of the RD. Our data demonstrate that in biofeedback group there was a significant recovery in visual performances that still remains evident after 3 months from the baseline.

Citing Articles

The effect of duration between sessions on microperimetric biofeedback training in patients with maculopathies.

Zhou J, Hou J, Li S, Zhang J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12524.

PMID: 38822030 PMC: 11143284. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63327-x.


Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole.

Sborgia A, Niro A, Pastore V, Albano V, Boscia G, Piepoli M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37629230 PMC: 10455115. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165188.


Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma.

Vingolo E, Casillo L, Mecarelli G, Limoli P Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16877.

PMID: 36207353 PMC: 9546844. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20191-x.


Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training.

Bozkurt Oflaz A, Ozturk B, Gonul S, Bakbak B, Gedik S, Okudan S Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022; 52(1):14-22.

PMID: 35196835 PMC: 8876780. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.73368.


Microperimetric Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Flap Technique for Large Macular Hole.

Sborgia G, Niro A, Tritto T, Albano V, Sborgia L, Sborgia A J Clin Med. 2020; 9(2).

PMID: 32085592 PMC: 7074367. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020556.


References
1.
Springer C, Bultmann S, Volcker H, Rohrschneider K . Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112(5):848-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.051. View

2.
Leung V, Wick B, Bedell H . Multifaceted treatment of congenital nystagmus: a report of 6 cases. Optom Vis Sci. 1996; 73(2):114-24. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199602000-00007. View

3.
Altpeter E, MacKeben M, Trauzettel-Klosinski S . The importance of sustained attention for patients with maculopathies. Vision Res. 2000; 40(10-12):1539-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00059-6. View

4.
Rossetti A, Doro D . Retained intravitreal lens fragments after phacoemulsification: complications and visual outcome in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28(2):310-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01079-3. View

5.
Kusaka S, Toshino A, Ohashi Y, SAKAUE E . Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal detachments. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1998; 42(3):218-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(97)00136-6. View