» Articles » PMID: 26997351

Impact of State Public Health Spending on Disease Incidence in the United States from 1980 to 2009

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2016 Mar 22
PMID 26997351
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To understand the relationship between state-level spending by public health departments and the incidence of three vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs): mumps, pertussis, and rubella in the United States from 1980 to 2009.

Data Sources: This study uses state-level public health spending data from The Census Bureau and annual mumps, pertussis, and rubella incidence counts from the University of Pittsburgh's project Tycho.

Study Design: Ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects, and random effects regression models were tested, with results indicating that a fixed effects model would be most appropriate model for this analysis.

Principal Findings: Model output suggests a statistically significant, negative relationship between public health spending and mumps and rubella incidence. Lagging outcome variables indicate that public health spending actually has the greatest impact on VPD incidence in subsequent years, rather than the year in which the spending occurred. Results were robust to models with lagged spending variables, national time trends, and state time trends, as well as models with and without Medicaid and hospital spending.

Conclusion: Our analysis indicates that there is evidence of a significant, negative relationship between a state's public health spending and the incidence of two VPDs, mumps and rubella, in the United States.

Citing Articles

Analytic approaches to assess the impact of local spending on sexually transmitted diseases.

Grembowski D, Lim S, Pantazis A, Bekemeier B Health Serv Res. 2021; 57(3):644-653.

PMID: 34806188 PMC: 9108077. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13915.


County health outcomes linkage to county spending on social services, building infrastructure, and law and order.

Cardona C, Anand N, Alfonso Y, Leider J, McCullough J, Resnick B SSM Popul Health. 2021; 16:100930.

PMID: 34692974 PMC: 8512609. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100930.


How the Chinese Government Has Done with Public Health from the Perspective of the Evaluation and Comparison about Public-Health Expenditure.

Jin H, Qian X Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(24).

PMID: 33322428 PMC: 7764182. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249272.

References
1.
Cutler D, Rosen A, Vijan S . The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960-2000. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(9):920-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa054744. View

2.
Sensenig A . Refining estimates of public health spending as measured in national health expenditures accounts: the United States experience. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007; 13(2):103-14. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200703000-00005. View

3.
Smith P, Jain N, Stevenson J, Mannikko N, Molinari N . Progress in timely vaccination coverage among children living in low-income households. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163(5):462-8. DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.25. View

4.
Schlipkoter U, Flahault A . Communicable Diseases: Achievements and Challenges for Public Health. Public Health Rev. 2020; 32:90-119. PMC: 7100685. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391594. View

5.
Cutler D, Miller G . The role of public health improvements in health advances: the twentieth-century United States. Demography. 2005; 42(1):1-22. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2005.0002. View