» Articles » PMID: 26996901

Non-invasive Expandable Prosthesis in Musculoskeletal Oncology Paediatric Patients for the Distal and Proximal Femur. First Results

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Mar 22
PMID 26996901
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The non-invasive expandable prosthesis for skeletally immature patients is used after limb salvage surgery following tumor resection. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of this treatment.

Methods: Seven paediatric patients with femoral tumors had resection and limb salvage with an uncemented non-invasive growing prosthesis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 9.8 (range 8-12) years. There were six distal femur osteosarcomas and one proximal femur Ewing sarcoma. Six total knee prosthesis were implanted at the time of primary tumor resection and one bipolar hip prosthesis was a revision from a failed osteoarticular hip allograft. Functional outcomes and emotional acceptance were assessed using the MSTS score.

Results: The mean follow-up was 65.3 months (range 29-91) months. Two patients died of pulmonary metastasis and there was no local recurrence. The mean femoral resection was 18 cm (range 17-19) on the knee, and 24 cm on the hip. Mean total expansion was 36.4 mm (range 12.3-63.5). The mean MSTS score after rehabilitation was 26.3 (range 21-29). There was one lengthening device failure, one late infection and one patient who required iliofemoral bypass grafting surgery for a pelvic metastasis. No local recurrence occurred.

Conclusions: The non-invasive expandable prosthesis reduces the final limb-length discrepancy in growing patients with an acceptable function and appears to have an advantage as compared to invasive expandable prostheses which require multiple surgical procedures, but the complications rate is still high.

Citing Articles

Allograft-prosthesis composite after proximal femur bone tumor resection in pediatric age: Is it effective in preserving bone stock?.

Campanacci D, Scanferla R, Muratori F, Scolari F, Scoccianti G, Tamburini A J Child Orthop. 2024; 18(5):531-539.

PMID: 39421396 PMC: 11483815. DOI: 10.1177/18632521241269338.


An algorithm for surgical treatment of children with bone sarcomas of the extremities.

Errani C, Atherley OMeally A, Tsukamoto S, Mavrogenis A, Tanaka Y, Manfrini M SICOT J. 2024; 10:38.

PMID: 39364963 PMC: 11451188. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024033.


What Are the Complications, Reconstruction Survival, and Functional Outcomes of Modular Prosthesis and Allograft-prosthesis Composite for Proximal Femur Reconstruction in Children With Primary Bone Tumors?.

Atherley OMeally A, Rizzi G, Cosentino M, Aiba H, Aso A, Solou K Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024; 483(3):455-469.

PMID: 39235267 PMC: 11827998. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003245.


Characteristics and Epidemiology of Megaprostheses Infections: A Systematic Review.

Cianni L, Taccari F, Bocchi M, Micheli G, Sangiorgi F, Ziranu A Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(13).

PMID: 38998818 PMC: 11241048. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12131283.


Expandable endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients: Where we are.

Ozturk R World J Orthop. 2024; 15(4):312-317.

PMID: 38680670 PMC: 11045467. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i4.312.


References
1.
Agarwal M, Gulia A, Ravi B, Ghyar R, Puri A . Revision of broken knee megaprostheses: new solution to old problems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(11):2904-13. PMC: 2947678. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1409-2. View

2.
Mavrogenis A, Papagelopoulos P . Expandable prostheses for the leg in children. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(3):173-5. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120222-03. View

3.
Capanna R, Campanacci D, Belot N, Beltrami G, Manfrini M, Innocenti M . A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 2006; 38(1):51-60, vi. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2006.10.008. View

4.
Henderson E, Pepper A, Marulanda G, Millard J, Letson G . What is the emotional acceptance after limb salvage with an expandable prosthesis?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(11):2933-8. PMC: 2947674. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1456-8. View

5.
Dotan A, Dadia S, Bickels J, Nirkin A, Flusser G, Issakov J . Expandable endoprosthesis for limb-sparing surgery in children: long-term results. J Child Orthop. 2011; 4(5):391-400. PMC: 2946532. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-010-0270-x. View