» Articles » PMID: 26992064

Mechanical Ventilation and Diaphragmatic Atrophy in Critically Ill Patients: An Ultrasound Study

Overview
Journal Crit Care Med
Date 2016 Mar 19
PMID 26992064
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Mechanical ventilation contributes to diaphragmatic atrophy and dysfunction, and few techniques exist to assess diaphragmatic function: the purpose of this study was to quantify diaphragm atrophy in a population of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients with ultrasound and to identify risk factors that can worsen diaphragmatic activity.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: ICU of a 1,200-bed university hospital.

Patients: Newly intubated adult critically ill patients.

Interventions: Diaphragm thickness in the zone of apposition was measured daily with ultrasound, from the first day of mechanical ventilation till discharge to the main ward.

Measurements And Main Results: Daily atrophy rate (ΔTdi/d) was calculated as the reduction in percentage from the previous measurement. To analyze the difference in atrophy rate (ΔTdi/d), ventilation was categorized into four classes: spontaneous breathing or continuous positive airway pressure; pressure support ventilation 5-12 cm H2O (low pressure support ventilation); pressure support ventilation greater than 12 cm H2O (high pressure support ventilation); and controlled mechanical ventilation. Multivariate analysis with ventilation support and other clinical variables was performed to identify risk factors for atrophy. Forty patients underwent a total of 153 ultrasonographic evaluations. Mean (SD) ΔTdi/d was -7.5% (12.3) during controlled mechanical ventilation, -5.3% (12.9) at high pressure support ventilation, -1.5% (10.9) at low pressure support ventilation, +2.3% (9.5) during spontaneous breathing or continuous positive airway pressure. At multivariate analysis, only the ventilation support was predictive of diaphragm atrophy rate. Pressure support predicted diaphragm thickness with coefficient -0.006 (95% CI, -0.010 to -0.002; p = 0.006).

Conclusions: In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, there is a linear relationship between ventilator support and diaphragmatic atrophy rate.

Citing Articles

The Perception of the Diaphragm with Ultrasound: Always There Yet Overlooked?.

Moller K, Saborio M, Gottschall H, Blaivas M, Borges A, Morf S Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003648 PMC: 11857681. DOI: 10.3390/life15020239.


Efficacy of ultrasonographic diaphragmatic parameters in distinguishing diaphragmatic dysfunction in cats.

Saisawart P, Sutthigran S, Kasemsuwan T, Sakulsirajit R, Ritthikulprasert S, Tachampa K J Feline Med Surg. 2024; 26(10):1098612X241275290.

PMID: 39451117 PMC: 11523170. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X241275290.


Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Vital Tool for Anesthesiologists in the Perioperative and Critical Care Settings.

Dhir A, Bhasin D, Bhasin-Chhabra B, Koratala A Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66908.

PMID: 39280520 PMC: 11401632. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66908.


Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Diaphragm.

Itagaki T, Akimoto Y, Takashima T, Oto J Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061618 PMC: 11276413. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141481.


Respiratory drive: a journey from health to disease.

Georgopoulos D, Bolaki M, Stamatopoulou V, Akoumianaki E J Intensive Care. 2024; 12(1):15.

PMID: 38650047 PMC: 11636889. DOI: 10.1186/s40560-024-00731-5.