» Articles » PMID: 26984469

Microdosimetry of DNA Conformations: Relation Between Direct Effect of (60)Co Gamma Rays and Topology of DNA Geometrical Models in the Calculation of A-, B- and Z-DNA Radiation-induced Damage Yields

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 18
PMID 26984469
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to obtain the energy deposition pattern of ionizing radiation in the nanometric scale of genetic material and to investigate the different sensitivities of the DNA conformations, direct effects of (60)Co gamma rays on the three A, B and Z conformations of DNA have been studied. For this purpose, single-strand breaks (SSB), double-strand breaks (DSB), base damage (BD), hit probabilities and three microdosimetry quantities (imparted energy, mean chord length and lineal energy) in the mentioned DNA conformations have been calculated and compared by using GEometry ANd Tracking 4 (Geant4) toolkit. The results show that A-, B- and Z-DNA conformations have the highest yields of DSB (1.2 Gy(-1) Gbp(-1)), SSB (25.2 Gy(-1) Gbp(-1)) and BD (4.81 Gy(-1) Gbp(-1)), respectively. Based on the investigation of direct effects of radiation, it can be concluded that the DSB yield is largely correlated to the topological characteristics of DNA models, although the SSB yield is not. Moreover, according to the comparative results of the present study, a reliable candidate parameter for describing the relationship between DNA damage yields and geometry of DNA models in the theoretical radiation biology research studies would be the mean chord length (4 V/S) of the models.

Citing Articles

Circular Mitochondrial DNA: A Geant4-DNA User Application for Evaluating Radiation-induced Damage in Circular Mitochondrial DNA.

Tavakoli M, Moradi H, Khanahmad H, Hosseini M J Med Signals Sens. 2017; 7(4):213-219.

PMID: 29204378 PMC: 5691560.

References
1.
Raisali G, Mirzakhanian L, Masoudi S, Semsarha F . Calculation of DNA strand breaks due to direct and indirect effects of Auger electrons from incorporated 123I and 125I radionuclides using the Geant4 computer code. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012; 89(1):57-64. DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2012.715785. View

2.
Debije M, Close D, Bernhard W . Reductive damage in directly ionized DNA: saturation of the C5=C6 bond of cytosine in d(CGCG)(2) crystals. Radiat Res. 2002; 157(3):235-42. PMC: 2629008. DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0235:rdidid]2.0.co;2. View

3.
Tan Z, Xia Y, Liu X, Zhao M, Ji Y, Li F . Cross sections of electron inelastic interactions in DNA. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2004; 43(3):173-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-004-0249-4. View

4.
Grosswendt B . Nanodosimetry, from radiation physics to radiation biology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005; 115(1-4):1-9. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci152. View

5.
Dingfelder M, RITCHIE R, Turner J, Friedland W, Paretzke H, Hamm R . Comparisons of calculations with PARTRAC and NOREC: transport of electrons in liquid water. Radiat Res. 2008; 169(5):584-94. PMC: 3835724. DOI: 10.1667/RR1099.1. View