» Articles » PMID: 26981863

Modulation of the Cutaneous Silent Period in the Upper-Limb with Whole-Body Instability

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Mar 17
PMID 26981863
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The silent period induced by cutaneous electrical stimulation of the digits has been shown to be task-dependent, at least in the grasping muscles of the hand. However, it is unknown if the cutaneous silent period is adaptable throughout muscles of the entire upper limb, in particular when the task requirements are substantially altered. The purpose of the present study was to examine the characteristics of the cutaneous silent period in several upper limb muscles when introducing increased whole-body instability. The cutaneous silent period was evoked in 10 healthy individuals with electrical stimulation of digit II of the right hand when the subjects were seated, standing, or standing on a wobble board while maintaining a background elbow extension contraction with the triceps brachii of ~5% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) strength. The first excitatory response (E1), first inhibitory response (CSP), and second excitatory response (E2) were quantified as the percent change from baseline and by their individual durations. The results showed that the level of CSP suppression was lessened (47.7 ± 7.7% to 33.8 ± 13.2% of baseline, p = 0.019) and the duration of the CSP inhibition decreased (p = 0.021) in the triceps brachii when comparing the seated and wobble board tasks. For the wobble board task the amount of cutaneous afferent inhibition of EMG activity in the triceps brachii decreased; which is proposed to be due to differential weighting of cutaneous feedback relative to the corticospinal drive, most likely due to presynaptic inhibition, to meet the demands of the unstable task.

Citing Articles

Motor Learning in a Complex Motor Task Is Unaffected by Three Consecutive Days of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Wilkins E, Pantovic M, Noorda K, Premyanov M, Boss R, Davidson R Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199702 PMC: 11351210. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080744.


Exploring the Influence of Inter-Trial Interval on the Assessment of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition.

de Albuquerque L, Pantovic M, Wilkins E, Morris D, Clingo M, Boss S Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39061727 PMC: 11274151. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11070645.


Postsynaptic potentials of soleus motor neurons produced by transspinal stimulation: a human single-motor unit study.

Yildiz N, Cecen S, Sancar N, Karacan I, Knikou M, Turker K J Neurophysiol. 2024; 131(6):1101-1111.

PMID: 38656134 PMC: 11381115. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00077.2024.

References
1.
Staude G, Wolf W . Objective motor response onset detection in surface myoelectric signals. Med Eng Phys. 2000; 21(6-7):449-67. DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(99)00067-3. View

2.
Don R, Pierelli F, Ranavolo A, Serrao M, Mangone M, Paoloni M . Modulation of spinal inhibitory reflex responses to cutaneous nociceptive stimuli during upper limb movement. Eur J Neurosci. 2008; 28(3):559-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06330.x. View

3.
Serrao M, Parisi L, Pierelli F, Rossi P . Cutaneous afferents mediating the cutaneous silent period in the upper limbs: evidences for a role of low-threshold sensory fibres. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(11):2007-14. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00675-7. View

4.
Schomburg E, Steffens H, Marx B . Nociceptive reflexes evoked by TTX-resistant C-fibre afferents and their sensitivity to opioids in the cat. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg. 2001; 26(3):193-6. View

5.
Todorov E, Jordan M . Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(11):1226-35. DOI: 10.1038/nn963. View