» Articles » PMID: 26981009

Assessment of the Bacterial Contamination of Hand Air Dryer in Washrooms

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Mar 17
PMID 26981009
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was carried out, using standard techniques, to identify and count the bacterial contamination of hand air dryers, used in washrooms. Bacteria were isolated from the air flow, outlet nozzle of warm air dryers in fifteen air dryers used in these washrooms. Bacteria were found to be relatively numerous in the air flows. Bacterially contaminated air was found to be emitted whenever a warm air dryer was running, even when not being used for hand drying. Our investigation shows that Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Bacillus cereus and Brevundimonad diminuta/vesicularis were emitted from all of the dryers sampled, with 95% showing evidence of the presence of the potential pathogen S. haemolyticus. It is concluded that hot air dryers can deposit pathogenic bacteria onto the hands and body of users. Bacteria are distributed into the general environment whenever dryers are running and could be inhaled by users and none-users alike. The results provide an evidence base for the development and enhancement of hygienic hand drying practices.

Citing Articles

Indoor particle dispersion due to hand dryer in public washroom: an in silico study.

Liao J, Ling Z, Zhang Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11554.

PMID: 37463924 PMC: 10354192. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37804-8.


Transmission of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases in public washrooms: A systematic review.

Vardoulakis S, Espinoza Oyarce D, Donner E Sci Total Environ. 2021; 803:149932.

PMID: 34525681 PMC: 8390098. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149932.


An Evaluation of the Hand Hygiene Behaviour and Compliance of the General Public When Using Public Restrooms in Northern Ireland (NI) during the Initial Weeks of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Lawson A, Cameron R, Vaganay-Miller M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(12).

PMID: 34204779 PMC: 8296206. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126385.


Degree of bacterial contamination in barbershops using hair dryers in Riyadh.

Al Yousef S Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021; 28(5):2692-2694.

PMID: 34025154 PMC: 8117043. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.083.


An Investigation of the General Population's Self-Reported Hand Hygiene Behaviour and Compliance in a Cross-European Setting.

Lawson A, Vaganay-Miller M, Cameron R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5).

PMID: 33804542 PMC: 7967740. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052402.


References
1.
Gustafson D, Vetter E, Larson D, Ilstrup D, Maker M, Thompson R . Effects of 4 hand-drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands: a randomized trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000; 75(7):705-8. DOI: 10.4065/75.7.705. View

2.
Ansari S, Springthorpe V, Sattar S, Tostowaryk W, Wells G . Comparison of cloth, paper, and warm air drying in eliminating viruses and bacteria from washed hands. Am J Infect Control. 1991; 19(5):243-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(05)80256-1. View

3.
Taylor J, Brown K, Toivenen J, Holah J . A microbiological evaluation of warm air hand driers with respect to hand hygiene and the washroom environment. J Appl Microbiol. 2000; 89(6):910-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01122.x. View

4.
MEERS P, Yeo G . Shedding of bacteria and skin squames after handwashing. J Hyg (Lond). 1978; 81(1):99-105. PMC: 2129756. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400053808. View

5.
Matthews J, Newsom S . Hot air electric hand driers compared with paper towels for potential spread of airborne bacteria. J Hosp Infect. 1987; 9(1):85-8. DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(87)90101-0. View