» Articles » PMID: 26976010

Physical Properties of Particulate Matter from Animal Houses-empirical Studies to Improve Emission Modelling

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 Mar 16
PMID 26976010
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Maintaining and preserving the environment from pollutants are of utmost importance. Particulate matter (PM) is considered one of the main air pollutants. In addition to the harmful effects of PM in the environment, it has also a negative indoor impact on human and animal health. The specific forms of damage of particulate emission from livestock buildings depend on its physical properties. The physical properties of particulates from livestock facilities are largely unknown. Most studies assume the livestock particles to be spherical with a constant density which can result in biased estimations, leading to inaccurate results and errors in the calculation of particle mass concentration in livestock buildings. The physical properties of PM, including difference in density as a function of particle size and shape, can have a significant impact on the predictions of particles' behaviour. The aim of this research was to characterize the physical properties of PM from different animal houses and consequently determine PM mass concentration. The mean densities of collected PM from laying hens, dairy cows and pig barns were 1450, 1520 and 2030 kg m(-3), respectively, whilst the mass factors were 2.17 × 10(-3), 2.18 × 10(-3) and 5.36 × 10(-3) μm, respectively. The highest mass concentration was observed in pig barns generally followed by laying hen barns, and the lowest concentration was in dairy cow buildings. Results are presented in such a way that they can be used in subsequent research for simulation purposes and to form the basis for a data set of PM physical properties.

Citing Articles

Exposure to Particulate Matter in the Broiler House Causes Dyslipidemia and Exacerbates It by Damaging Lung Tissue in Broilers.

Shen D, Guo Q, Huang K, Mao W, Wang K, Zeng W Metabolites. 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36984803 PMC: 10052321. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13030363.


Pig barns ammonia and greenhouse gas emission mitigation by slurry aeration and acid scrubber.

Mostafa E, Selders A, Gates R, Buescher W Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020; 27(9):9444-9453.

PMID: 31919827 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07613-x.

References
1.
Iversen M, Kirychuk S, DROST H, Jacobson L . Human health effects of dust exposure in animal confinement buildings. J Agric Saf Health. 2001; 6(4):283-8. DOI: 10.13031/2013.1911. View

2.
Golbabaei F, Islami F . Evaluation of workers' exposure to dust, ammonia and endotoxin in poultry industries at the province of Isfahan, Iran. Ind Health. 2000; 38(1):41-6. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.38.41. View

3.
Fischer H, Polikarpov I, Craievich A . Average protein density is a molecular-weight-dependent function. Protein Sci. 2004; 13(10):2825-8. PMC: 2286542. DOI: 10.1110/ps.04688204. View

4.
Riedler J, Eder W, Oberfeld G, Schreuer M . Austrian children living on a farm have less hay fever, asthma and allergic sensitization. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000; 30(2):194-200. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00799.x. View

5.
Pedersen S, Nonnenmann M, Rautiainen R, Demmers T, Banhazi T, Lyngbye M . Dust in pig buildings. J Agric Saf Health. 2001; 6(4):261-74. DOI: 10.13031/2013.1909. View